SM Scores 2006-2010

[ApocalypseAp]

Re: SM Scores

It isn't irrelevant because you're implying that somehow playing for fun is insufficient. You're trying a little too hard, buddy.

Nothing I've said has been hypocritical. Seriously man, just stop. I'll probably make a vid eventually anyway. Just because I don't drop and give you twenty because you are, in fact, an internet nerd without any other commitments, is not indicative that I'm somehow dodging something, especially when I've provided lots of videos at a fast response rate. I could just as easily say "Fsck you" and leave it at that.

Whether or not people believe me does not stop me from having fun with this game, and that is why I play.

I'm not trying at all, lmfao. You just don't listen at all, do you? All you do is talk ****. Nobody's going to believe you after they see that ridiculous Disregard score.

And you are SEVERELY hypocritical. Calling people internet nerds without any other commitments when you're doing the same thing as they are. You don't even know me, yet you pretend you do. If anyone's the internet nerd, it's you.

[MrRubix]

Re: SM Scores

Not worth arguing any further, use some evidence next time and support your claims. Which is hard, considering I've actually accomplished what I've done.

[Bahamut-X]

Re: SM Scores

-Then explain, where are the inconsistencies and why are they inconsistent?

You quad happy angel, Z, and ageha. You post a 19-1 on UGS oni.

You don't fc air, yet you fc OX1311. Not to mention you cut down from like 30 greats and around 6 cbs to a 1x greats fc.

Tell me how that is consistent.

-So I "came out of nowhere." Irrelevant to skill.
-So I flew to rank one faster than anyone else. Irrelevant to the issue and doesn't prove BS.

Nothing we say can prove BS, but flying to rank one on almost every song in record time is extremely strong evidence of BS.

When I say "came out of nowhere" I mean you haven't been a part of the community long enough for people to see reasonable growth in skill, which is why the fact that you flew to rank 1 and are getting these ridiculous SM scores are so illogical.

-Groundbreaking score, perhaps, illogical how?

Having that poor of accuracy in a section of a song THAT FAST and not getting a boo or good really doesn't make sense.

[midare]

Re: SM Scores

Rubix dude, just stop arguing and make a vid. =\ If you really are legit, then a vid will prove it. Put a tv or at least a background clock or whatever to prove no slowdown, launch the game from the folder also showing the .ini. and when you're done do what ieat did... show judgement and life, then open up that .ini and enlarge it on word so everyone can actually really see your settings.

[cetaka]

Re: SM Scores

he's just thriving on all the bs calling, just ignore him and go to odi where nobody believes him anyway rofl >_>

[-paexaea-]

Re: SM Scores

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 16 (15 members and 1 guests)
-paexaea-, Bahamut-X, cetaka, dore, Dr.K, EnfEnEt, Exouds, ieatyourlvllol, midare, MrRubix, Slinkyyyyyy, Sprite-, Tayfun, TS_SonicMaster

What the ****.

[Sprite-]

Re: SM Scores

wow insane score *insert username here*!!
go for the AAAA!

[dore]

Re: SM Scores

da bs police is out

[ieatyourlvllol]

Re: SM Scores

you are, in fact, an internet nerd without any other commitments

I'm sorry, but you crossed the line there.

-Groundbreaking score, perhaps, illogical how?

In addition to what Bahamut stated...

If you have enough speed and control to full combo Disregard, there is no reason whatsoever that you should get almost a 2:1 ratio of perfects to greats. When you're to the point that you can combo 300 bpm 16th stream while getting only 8% perfects, greats should come only occasionally, not once for every two perfects that you get.

All other players who have done well on Disregard have gotten P:G ratios like 14:1, 7:1, 6:1, and none of them have combo'd it.

[-paexaea-]

Re: SM Scores

E DRAMA GOGOGOG

[DyfnalltDH]

Re: SM Scores

hahaha rubix vs the rest of the experienced SM community... I wonder who'll win.
Not the guy who thinks everyone else is retarded. I'll guarantee.

ps you're ****in bs lmao air noncombos I can't pass disregard half the time but I FC air 99/100 times

[midare]

Re: SM Scores

sorry, i forgot to add that if, really, rubix didn't care about what we thought/"sm is just a stupid arrow game, i play it only to have fun/you guys are dumb i don't care what you think"... then we wouldn't be having this conversation on the brag board, if at all. =\

[Exouds]

Re: SM Scores

I'm sorry, but you crossed the line there.

Wasn't that directed at Apocalypse?

If you have enough speed and control to full combo Disregard, there is no reason whatsoever that you should get almost a 2:1 ratio of perfects to greats. When you're to the point that you can combo 300 bpm 16th stream while getting only 8% perfects, greats should come only occasionally, not once for every two perfects that you get.

All other players who have done well on Disregard have gotten P:G ratios like 14:1, 7:1, 6:1, and none of them have combo'd it.

As I understood it, that's the way it is, he gets greats occasionally. The reason for the high amount of them is because he has to hit the trills slightly early (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...ostcount=10913).
I'm pretty sure that Rubix would get a good PA ratio if he didn't do that, but on the other hand he'd miss and be like the other good players.

On another note: We probably shouldn't be having this discussion in this thread.

[Loot You]

Re: SM Scores

why would you hit trills early in SM D:

that doesn't make any sense to me.

unless they were like omg 32nd trills at 250bpm

[MrRubix]

Re: SM Scores

If you have enough speed and control to full combo Disregard, there is no reason whatsoever that you should get almost a 2:1 ratio of perfects to greats. When you're to the point that you can combo 300 bpm 16th stream while getting only 8% perfects, greats should come only occasionally, not once for every two perfects that you get.

All other players who have done well on Disregard have gotten P:G ratios like 14:1, 7:1, 6:1, and none of them have combo'd it.

Assuming a consistently difficult song -- Disregard has many sections of varying difficulties. Just because it's a 2:1 ratio means very little -- plenty of people have scores in similar ranges for songs of equally varying difficulties, comparatively, I'm sure.


"You quad happy angel, Z, and ageha. You post a 19-1 on UGS oni.

You don't fc air, yet you fc OX1311. Not to mention you cut down from like 30 greats and around 6 cbs to a 1x greats fc.

Tell me how that is consistent"

My fingers slip sometimes, I'm not God, you know. Just because I get a miss on an easier song means nothing, and a 19-1 on UGS oni isn't a huge deal anyway. Sometimes I miscalculate rolls, it's not a big deal. I'd say my scores are arguably consistent, especially when Happy Angel, Z, Air, and Ageha are all much easier. And 0x is easy to improve if you approach songs differently. I have to almost angle my hands vertically to improve on such songs.

"why would you hit trills early in SM D:"

Sometimes it ensures higher degree of success with respect to comboing. If you start early then the speed of the arrows "catch up." I could probably PA them a bit better with some practice.