Film Project/Music Video

Re: Film Project/Music Video

Doesn't belong in music. Watch your forum placement from now on.

also i only briefly glanced at it but the camerawork looked really bad

Re: Film Project/Music Video

I'm sure the storyboard (if there is one) for this makes it out a lot better than this.

Protip: the whole black and white grainy old film look just makes it look ****ty. Not introspective or serious or whatever you were going for.

Also, as Tokzic said, bad camera work. Get someone with a steady hand AND A ****ING TRIPOD.

oh and when using rule of thirds, I dont know about you, but I dont like seeing someone walking toward the right on the right side of the screen. When 2/3 of the screen is in front of the person, it's a lot better than when it's BEHIND them.

ps the action is kind of really slow moving and really repetitive and also unexplained, but it really seems like you've gone out of your way to make it like that.

Re: Film Project/Music Video

I want to start out by saying the camera work was supposed to be shaky. That was intentional.
[I actually have a very steady hand when need be, check out my first music video, that was shot digitally on my YouTube account if you think I'm just b.s.-ing you. Almost 75% of it was shot without a tripod.]

Second, this was shot on actual film - Kodak black and white reversal film actually. The grainy film look tends to happen when working with film.


The weird angles and whatnot were also supposed to be that way. I know, it doesn't follow all of the rules that they teach in film and video classes, but the point was to be experimental. And the zooming, which I know isn't that great is done with a tiny lever, about half the size of your index finger, so, for a first time I don't think it was too terrible. The camera was a Bolex, if you know anything at all about film cameras. It's not like working with digital equipment, at all, hence the reason I was asking for thoughts and opinions in regard to shooting film. Not people to bash without reason.

Re: Film Project/Music Video

I'm aware.

It still looks bad for it, and still fails to effectively convey the message you're trying to get across with it. You're better off just using normal digital equipment, or if you must use film, get a better quality and color or something.

And with digital work, you can do subtle things like desaturation and it won't be so obvious and distracting.

ps Just because you're unique doesn't mean you're better for it. Sometimes what everyone else does is done specifically because that is the best way to do it.

Re: Film Project/Music Video


It is for a film class, therefore, I really don't see how I'm supposed to use digital equipment and pass.

And second of all, this is the grain and stock we were supposed to use. He didn't want us to spend a small fortune when it was everyone's first project, and there were chances that some people may have ruined their stock so easily. Working with film is a lot more expensive than video.

I get the feeling that you are not as well informed about film, or film classes and projects as you first implied in earlier responses.

Re: Film Project/Music Video

With my video class though i'm in Video one i see that the shaking work for this one becuase of the wind noise i heard. What i saw of it it didn't sound synced to the music which my techer has this petpeve about. Also the shots were not transitioned as the action started it seamed.

Re: Film Project/Music Video

In my video class we're filming a music video. Well, we're making the video but using the pre-made audio.
I chose Piano Man by Billy Joel. The thing is, when you're making a video, make sure that you get plenty of reaction shots. My persoanl favorite is getting a medium reaction over the shoulder shot. But they're important becasue it's the audiences only insight to the characters mind ^^

Re: Film Project/Music Video

Why the hell would they have a class wherein you are required to work in film.

Film is antiquated. It should only exist on that level for hobbies and non-serious endeavors. In addition, you will ALWAYS be better off with practice in digital experience than old techniques with film. There is nothing that film does that digital doesn't do better.

The only thing I can figure is that your school is refusing to upgrade to digital equipment due to poorness or stubborn stupidity, or they're simply offering a worthless class that will get you nowhere in particular (compared to a similar class built around modern tech). I assure you that someone who took an AV class based around digital technology would more easily get a job in the selected field than someone who simply knows the TRADE of working with film.

Thank you for agreeing with me that digital video is better.