flypie posted this on my site and I thought this was unjust to lock it and not post something.
[[[link removed]]]
discuss (without flaming please, don't be lame).
[[[link removed]]]
discuss (without flaming please, don't be lame).
-
-
RE: and people said I didn
Looks like we have a revolution in our hands.
Q -
RE: and people said I didn
Um...no comment?
EDIT: Ok, fine. Comment. I think Tass does a half-decent job. He knows when topics need to be locked, even though he could be a whore about it sometimes. Basically, what I'm saying is that he's doing an ok job. Are there people that could do a better job then him? Of course. But he is still doing an ok job.
I hate to talk about a person, let alone mod like this...but I'd be willing to de-mod Tass if we replace him with a better, more efficient mod. Otherwise, if that won't happen, leave him be.hiComment
-
RE: and people said I didn
While there should have been a reason why it was locked, I don't think you need to take it as some big anti-freedom huge ffr-government evil conspiracy.
Because it's just one locked topic.Originally posted by Henri PoincaréComment
-
RE: and people said I didn
I think whichever mod locked it just felt that it was considered flaming and didn't give it a second thought.
Still, an explanation would have been nice.Comment
-
Re: RE: and people said I didn
uh I didn'tOriginally posted by BluE_MeaniE
The topic title was about how I thought it was ironic how people would go off on how I was "not allowing free speech" and then this happens.Comment
-
RE: Re: RE: and people said I didn
That's not ironic. You didn't allow free speech, some new people come in, and then THEY don't allow it. That is coincidence--not irony.
Signature subject to change.
THE ZERRRRRG.Comment
-
Re: RE: and people said I didn
Yes, but this makes it sound like that.Originally posted by The_Q
Plus, you're at least partly saying that FFR, or whoever locked the topic, is not allowing free speech.
And that's really not the case.
EDIT:
Referring to Arch's comment.Originally posted by Henri PoincaréComment
-
I agree that that thread really didn't even need to exist. I thought it was fairly obvious why it was locked. It was a worthless thread; nobody gave any examples or anything. It was about as bad as Katiechen coming back as ffr master and making a thread that just said "You mods suck!"
--Guido
Originally posted by GrandiagodComment
-
Re: RE: and people said I didn
I don't really think it sounds like that at all O_oOriginally posted by BluE_MeaniE
and uh, no I'm not. I was just pointing out irony, that's all. If anything, FFR is probably the most lenient music game site I know of.Comment
-
Flypie thought I was a crappy mod at one point but she warmed up to me, and I don't really think I changed my modding style that much.
Anyway, creating a new topic that links to a locked topic for purposes of reviving the discussion is, in essence, the same as re-creating that topic. Link removed + lock.Comment
-
LD is asleep. he locked that. then flypie posted another in FFR Suggestions. i posted my reply in there, and at LDs request, locked it.
i don't get what your purpose is here Arch. are you still upset that you left FFR and are now coming back? that Synth took away your powers? i don't get it.
i really don't care if people have an issue with how i mod threads. if someone is upset with my locking a thread, all they have to do is IM me and i will happily explain everything in full detail, as i have done with many people.
with all that... i see no purpose for this thread except to post for THIRD time that a few people don't like that i lock the topics that need to be locked. i'll wait for chardish to lock this, as it'd seem.... like i was being spiteful to lock it myself.RIPComment
-
But every thread that Arch is part of becomes a problem. Even this one. Once again his thread has people arguing over stupid crap.
Time to put this spark to bed.. LOCKED
Cheers,
SynthlightComment
Comment