Hidden Heaven :: FFR Batch Submission
Matthia - Hidden Heaven - Blitz Lunar [6 / 10]
Nov/Dec 2020
Public
Rejected
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273001&postcount=2
Blanket

Simfile Folder Name

Hidden Heaven (Matthia)

Note Count

1749

Chart Length

2:45

Average NPS

10.7941

Estimated Difficulty

79.26

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 7

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 3 3 - 39 4 - 37

Jumps

x 390

Hands

x 61

Quads

x 2

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
21 - 21.00 nps 2 Seconds
35 - 17.50 nps 5 Seconds
69 - 13.80 nps 10 Seconds
133 - 13.30 nps 30 Seconds
359 - 11.97 nps 1 Minute
669 - 11.15 nps

Color Count

x 607 (34.71%)
x 652 (37.28%)
x 61 (3.49%)
x 319 (18.24%)
x 53 (3.03%)
x 38 (2.17%)
x 4 (0.23%)
x 2 (0.11%)
x 13 (0.74%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.7s0.37s0.37s0.37s0.37s0.37s0.37s0.37s
35
28
21
14
7

Hidden Heaven
-------------
- Perms, sync, metadata good.

- 10.722: Please break up this anchor; there's no repeated sound here, and it's quite noticeable going into the jumptrill. Suggest 1 2 3 [24] starting from 10.369.
- 13.192: Unnecessary anchor, please remove.
- 18.486: Another unnecessary anchor with space to fix it, 23[124] works well here. I'll stop mentioning these at this point; remember to give the rest of the chart a look through for these.
- 31.633: If you're following the 32nds at 36.663, I'd advise a 16th here. (Also 145.986.)
- 31.898, 37.545, etc.: Missing hand.
- 42.905: If this 64th is for percussion, it should be at 42.949. If it's for the chiptune, I think it's actually correct where it is; the one at 157.258 is similar to this but without the percussion & it's correct. Weird.
- 52.016: Unnecessary minijack on column 4. Similar notes at 57.663 & 58.545.
- 55.030 etc.: Advisory that this is 14ms separated from the 8th, so there's a pretty fair chance it'll convert as a flam without framefixes.
- 60.663: Seems a little needlessly aggressive for the sound, particularly given this is kind of a break in the song. Since the chiptune melody continues at 60.927 as well, I'd suggest something along the lines of 3 1 [23] [14] [23] 4 [123] starting from 60.486.
- 62.957: Thus far this section you've been anchoring the kicks, so this note is a weird break from that. Ties in to unnecessary anchoring.
- 68.427: On the other hand, this should be anchored on column 3 still.
- 82.545: This jump is not included in previous instances of this pattern. Either add them in the other instances or remove this one.
- 85.810: Wouldn't be remiss to have a 16th to the synth here.
- 87.663: phew. You had rolls here last occurrence of this (82.016), and that was with less density around the 24ths as well. Please use rolls here as well.
- 95.957: There is a sneaky long 23 trill here, recommend breaking it up.
- 106.633: Optional, but might be more tasteful here to make this 16th just a single on column 1. This lessens the awkwardness on the right hand, and is also justifiable within the section because this is just the kick without the additional chiptune melody that was present on the jump just before.
- 109.104: Gross lol, please change up patterning here so this isn't a really funky looking 6-note right hand trill.
- 132.133: This is a bit gnarlier than the other instances of the pattern, recommend changing the 32nds to be descending so the pattern mirrors 116.604.
- 138.398: Missing 16th.
- 146.251: Missing hand, see 31.898.

* As mentioned in the notes above, watch out for unnecessary anchor patterning throughout the chart. I'd additionally recommend keeping an eye out for locations where you have two consecutive jumps of the same type going to different pitches or instruments, e.g. 19.898.
* The way you follow the 24th bursts is not consistent. At 5.780 you use trills, at 17.133 it's 4-column rolls, and at 76.369 it's 3-column rolls. Please make these consistent; with context of my note at 87.663, I'd highly recommend using rolls everywhere (with my personal preference being the 3-column ones).

- Not a bad chart at all, pretty varied and technical file and it's a lot of fun. My biggest issues with it are the two *'d comments just above, which are both quite prevalent throughout the chart and make it feel unpolished. Those two issues (especially the first one) happen just a little too often for me to feel comfortable giving this CQ, but this file really isn't that far off of being accepted. [6/10]