Icyxis
------
- Perms, sync, metadata good.

- 15.915: Should just be a single.
** 16.523-18.685: This sequence is really brutal and spiky. Partially this is because the bursts at 17.198, 17.469 are 32nds when they're done later (see 64.225) as 24ths, but I also think it would benefit from reducing the layering coming out of it slightly--probably just changing the bursts to 24ths and making 17.198 a single is fine.
- 25.712-26.928: Right hand anchor transition with the minijack is a bit much.
- 32.536: Seems to be a ghost note--omitted at 31.455.
- 46.860: Ghost note. Also 59.833, 61.996, 66.320, etc. Keep an eye out--there are others like these.
- 47.671: I can't hear a note here, let alone a minijack.
- 52.131: Great trill usage, but would be slightly more effective if patterns were rearranged so this 16th were not also part of it.
- 69.090: The 24ths start here. To be honest, I'm not sure if it should be two 24th bursts (at 69.090 and 69.360) separated by a 16th or just straight 24ths--leaning toward the former, though.
- 86.388: Yikes on the left hand here.
- 91.185: Arguable missing note to percussion.
- 95.171: Do recommend being a little less gung-ho with layering in this burst. (Probably by making the 8th a single.)

** Burst usage is quite inconsistent. The song is really, really busy and so honestly I'd recommend just giving it another look for bursts yourself to pick up on things I missed (since I'm sure there are some), but these should be a good starting point:
Missing bursts: 28.009, 45.306, 60.577, 71.793, 72.333, 75.847, 77.739, etc.
Ghost bursts: 38.009
Questionable bursts:
- 64.901 (the other bursts in this section are also 32nds, but you approximate them by 24ths. What makes this different? Also, you reduce the layering coming in to / out of this burst at 73.279, but not here.)
--> This happens pretty frequently where the longer burst suddenly becomes 32nds. Keep an eye out.
- 72.063 is not a burst, but there is a burst sound there--it's fainter than the others in the area, though, plus you have the minijack, so it's up to you whether you want to include it.
- 80.982 (I think I hear this one, but it's really damn quiet)

- I definitely feel like you could've used a more expressive layering scheme, but yours does what it sets out to do, so I can't really fault it.
- The bursts need a look for consistency and the spike at 16.523 needs to be fixed (which just comes down the bursts again, really) but this isn't too far from being acceptable. The burst problem is just a bit too big for CQ though. [6/10]