Can't Stop Lovin' You (Ayane Fukumi Remix) :: FFR Batch Submission
gold stinger - Can't Stop Lovin' You (Ayane Fukumi Remix) - Ayane Fukumi ft. Renard [4.5 / 10]
Nov/Dec 2020
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4753502&postcount=267
Ayane Fukumi recently obtained blanket permissions: https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4753502&postcount=267

Used a lot of color theory to emphasize the glitch nature of the chart. If you don't like some form of color, let me know.

Simfile Folder Name

Can't Stop Lovin' You (Ayane Fukumi Remix) (gold stinger)

Note Count

2635

Chart Length

2:40

Average NPS

16.7054

Estimated Difficulty

100.87

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 37

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 27 3 - 165 4 - 748

Jumps

x 562

Hands

x 82

Quads

x 16

Color Jumps

x 66

Color Hands

x 14

Color Quads

x 16

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
15 - 45.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
22 - 44.00 nps 1 Second
33 - 33.00 nps 2 Seconds
51 - 25.50 nps 5 Seconds
113 - 22.60 nps 10 Seconds
208 - 20.80 nps 30 Seconds
558 - 18.60 nps 1 Minute
1086 - 18.10 nps

Color Count

x 781 (29.64%)
x 544 (20.65%)
x 72 (2.73%)
x 579 (21.97%)
x 60 (2.28%)
x 267 (10.13%)
x 62 (2.35%)
x 78 (2.96%)
x 192 (7.29%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.83s0.83s0.83s0.73s0.63s0.6s0.6s0.57s
35
28
21
14
7

Can't Stop Lovin' You (Ayane Fukumi Remix)
------------------------------------------
- Perms, sync, metadata good.

- 0.093: Should just be a 24th triplet.
- 3.022: Remove this or add at 2.450.
- 5.914: This is a 64th late, should be at 5.897.
- 9.807: At 4.093, you followed this with straight 32nds. Keep it consistent.
- 12.307: Given how little restraint you exercised in this chart, I'm surprised you omitted this note.
- 16.045, 16.141: No player is going to have any clue what this goes to.
- 17.236: Weird, awkward roll transition. The sound doesn't merit intricate patterns here, so why not 124132 starting from the 16th before at 17.164?
- 22.091: Same sound as previous hand, should be [134].
- 24.948: Does this sound really deserve what is effectively a 4-note 315-bpm OHT??
- 25.519-27.516: What are the green notes for? I can't see a common element for all these.
- 29.516: Why a jump here?
- 28.480: Careful with column 1.
- 29.230: Jack should be 3/32nds, not 12ths.
- 30.229, 30.661: Again, no idea why these are green. What is present here but not at 29.801?
- 33.301: What are the offset 24ths for?
- 37.480: Missing note.
- 38.372, 38.658: These two bursts last a 32nd longer than the one at 38.087 and so could be accented by 4-note bursts instead of 3 (like 37.658).
- 41.420: This is on the 16th; what was 12ths is now 3/16ths.
- 55.158: *Massive* column 3 bias starts here. Please break it up, probably at 56.087.
- 60.768: The buzz starts on the 8th, so this is a ghost note.
- 70.446: Missing note.
- 75.518: I think the colouring on this hand is highly unnecessary, but if you do keep it there's no reason the white note should be on the same column as the previous white note because it gives the impression of a repeated sound which is not present.
- 80.660: Unnecessary column 3 anchor.
- 87.803: Really not a fan of the colouring swapping columns on this minijack.
- 93.946: More column 3 bias.
- 96.017: Gross OHT out of roll, please rearrange so this ends in a two-handed trill.
- 99.447: 9-note right hand trill without any PR reason for it.
- 100.090: Column 2 bias.
- 101.518: Missing note.
- 106.377: Cyan colouring should be on the previous 8th instead.
- 116.093: This is literally a 46nps rainbow jumptrill that cycles through every note colour except white. Why? What about this sound deserves this much emphasis? Why not just chart it as you did 95.517? Why do you gigadump this and not even acknowledge the similar buzz at 117.490?
- 122.305: Gross cameljack, not to mention colour theory that conflicts with literally the note before this hand.
- 122.948: This is a constant tone. Using a staircase pattern here is ridiculous.
- 130.090: Huge mismatch between pattern intensity and song intensity. The one at 130.661 makes sense, but this doesn't.
- 146.375: You could get away with a single 16th after this, but 24ths don't make much sense even as a dump.
- 154.089: Particularly gross 32nd pattern.

- Every single colour quad in this chart is overkill. Most of them I would argue against even being quads, let alone *four-colour* quads.
- This chart delights in using gross patterns, often in spots where they're not really warranted. For a couple examples, see 4.093, 21.662, and 24.948. Of particular concern are the 32nds into hands, and foremost among those are the cameljacks.
- This chart needs a lot of work. [4.5/10]