Point Zero 2 :: FFR Batch Submission
Tundrus - Point Zero 2 - Synthwulf [4.5 / 10]
Nov/Dec 2020
PublicEvents
Rejected
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273002&postcount=3
First song sub. Sorry if I did anything wrong. Perms listed in "Permissions List and Information v8 thread"

Simfile Folder Name

Point Zero 2 (Tundrus)

Note Count

694

Chart Length

2:00

Average NPS

6.1434

Estimated Difficulty

49.81

First Note

0:07

Ending Note Delay

0:02

Hand Bias

x -18

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 1 3 - 3 4 - 0

Jumps

x 62

Hands

x 14

Quads

x 3

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
9 - 18.00 nps 1 Second
15 - 15.00 nps 2 Seconds
26 - 13.00 nps 5 Seconds
60 - 12.00 nps 10 Seconds
113 - 11.30 nps 30 Seconds
296 - 9.87 nps 1 Minute
475 - 7.92 nps

Color Count

x 309 (44.52%)
x 202 (29.11%)
x 2 (0.29%)
x 178 (25.65%)
x 3 (0.43%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.43s1.43s1.4s1.4s1.4s1.23s1.23s1.07s
35
28
21
14
7

Point Zero 2
------------
- Perms, metadata good.
- Sync is slightly off, change offset from -0.223 to -0.214.
- Folder contains .sm.old file, please remove.

- 39.743-49.624: Layering in this section seems arbitrary. What dictates whether a note here is a jump or a single? Why does it switch to all jumps halfway through?
- 52.449, 53.860, etc.: Jumps (or hands, in cases like 53.860 and 59.508) wouldn't be remiss at the ends of these trills--you follow them elsewhere, and given the streams later on they wouldn't be spiky.
- 56.155, 56.508: You followed these as singles previously in this section (e.g. 55.625).
- 56.596: Should be a 16th here.
- 57.213: Should be a jump, not a hand.
- 58.625: Should be a jump.
- 60.566: You used trills for previous instances of this sound, and there's not much reason to break that motif here.
- 61.625: Could use as 16th triplet starting here. Also, the next two hands should just be jumps, and there is a missing note at 62.155.
- 62.684: You suddenly stop following snares with jumps here. I don't think this needs to be done to keep the difficulty in line with the rest of the chart, but if that's your concern a reasonable compromise would be to only follow the first snare of a string of 16ths with a jump and otherwise follow them faithfully.
- 63.213: Ghost note.
- 65.155, 66.566: Missing notes, followed at 67.978.
- 67.713: Ghost note.
- 67.890, 71.772: No reason for a minijack here.
- 68.508, 69.037: On the other hand, you suddenly start following these with jumps here with little reason. At 67.978 you used a single, and as mentioned before, at 65.155 and 66.566 you didn't follow them at all. I recommend following consistently following these by singles.
- 71.155-71.860: A roll isn't a very effective pattern here. Since the kick happens on the beat and snares happen off of it, you might want to anchor the kicks and use trills for the snares, something like 132312321323[14].
- 73.449: There's room for another flam here, or maybe just a single.
- 78.919: This should be a jump at most, not a quad.
- 83.508: Stopping the stream here feels arbitrary. I recommend continuing it until 84.213 and reducing 84.213, 84.566 to jumps.
- 103.096, 104.508: Should be a single, not a jump.
- 104.684: No need to reduce snares to singles here. Also, the 16ths that come in at 105.390 don't make much sense--they've been going on (at constant intensity) the whole time, so bringing them in here is a pretty arbitrary way to create tension.
- 106.096: This quad should be a jump.
- 107.508-end: I see what you're doing with the piano here, but honestly recommend just following all of it--it's all pretty prominent.
- 117.390: This quad should be a single.

- As with Gargoyle, this chart needs a lot of PR work--the lack of it is particularly apparent in slower sections, but there could be a bit more of an eye to detail in the 16th streams too. It's less of an issue in this one, though, because a much larger share of this chart focuses primarily on the percussion. While there is still some room for improvement there, it's definitely a lot less noticeable.
- Despite some inconsistencies toward the middle of the chart, you've mostly got a pretty clear structure and I think it fits. The biggest issue holding you back is the lack of PR. I strongly suggest fixing up this one before Gargoyle; it would be much less work, and a bit more instructive. Hope to see this resubmitted later with fixes! [4.5/10]