Undici :: FFR Batch Submission
Nov/Dec 2020
PublicTokenEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
Undici (ositzxz369)
Note Count
473
Chart Length
3:20
Average NPS
2.4014
Estimated Difficulty
14.85
First Note
0:03
Ending Note Delay
0:02
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 3
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
4 - 12.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
5 - 10.00 nps
1 Second
7 - 7.00 nps
2 Seconds
12 - 6.00 nps
5 Seconds
25 - 5.00 nps
10 Seconds
44 - 4.40 nps
30 Seconds
122 - 4.07 nps
1 Minute
205 - 3.42 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
2.23s2.1s1.8s1.6s1.6s1.47s1.33s1.33s
Posted at 3:16pm on June 3rd, 2021
Undici (ositzxz369) [5.0/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
-[00:00.119] PR? Is the first note not lower than the 2nd note? Same with 00:10.776.
-Let me just ask straight off the bat, because this has been a recurring thing in batch: Why do you guys want actually ridiculously easy versions of super hard notable songs? Doesn’t that like, take away from what makes them notable?
-[00:28.762] Missing 4th. (it’s a follow-up note from 00:27.541.) Repeats at 00:34.091, 00:39.420
-[00:45.415] Somewhat confused about how this pattern is following here, because the 2nd 4th note at 00:45.415 is in between two separate sounds, and the latter one takes precedence. So, wouldn’t 8ths be used here?
-[00:51.188] I still have no idea what these 4ths are following. If I am going to get confused about what they’re going to, imagine how confused a level 0, barely even D1 player is going to be.
-There’s a lot of repetition of the same pattern (7 times) that I have no idea what it’s following.
-Rest of the chart looks fine, but the nature of Undici (as a song) doesn’t really fit for a super duper easy file like this. And even then, the chart kind of misses the point of an easy file; It has to be readable, easy to parse, and fun to play for a super low-skilled player. And, given the chart, I wasn’t really able to see that experience. It was a good attempt at an easy file, but gets a no from me in its current state.