TC_Halogen - 5.5/10
- offset is fine
- as a whole throughout the chart, your jump usage is quite inconsistent
- section where the chart is “ad-lib” could use some slight tightening in rhythms
- 9.942: should also be an U
- 43.092: that’s kinda mean; 32nds is probably better here or some sort of two note flam instead, this is a bit of an overemphasis
- 49.692: this feels unnecessarily abrasive
- 1:28.092: jump usage here is a bit aggressive because the sounds are chopped up, and your usage of jumps here is why you use triples right after -- it’s contextually correct, but too heavy-handed
- 1:31.092: feels more like this should be a jumpjack couplet compared to 1:31.992
- 1:37.392: why’d you do that here?
- 1:46.617: not entirely sure that this should be a jumpjack
- 1:50.592: that’s a little rough
- 1:53.292: this feels out of place
- 2:00.942: this stream can probably continue up to the 4th note before making the contrast to the vocals
- 2:07.561: accuracy to this can be improved a bit
- 2:08.442/2:10.542: jumps are fine, but connecting them as jacks is not
- 2:19.692: this is quite spiky
- 2:23.892: ghost note
- 2:25.467/2:25.917: missing note
- 2:30.471: another missing note
- 2:32.142: you’d probably be better off making this and the next note singles to better emphasize the actual snare hits coming with the later [LD][UR]
- 2:33.192: no need for minijacks here
- 2:38.817/2:39.492: ^
- 2:42.642: also ^, but the layering is a bit heavy-handed as well given that the percussion isn’t quite as aggressive
- 2:45.867: don’t need the minijack here either
- 2:50.592/etc: the sampling isn’t 8th notes here and varies almost immediately, so the first part of this has improper rhythms
- 3:08.292: a bit overdone on the accenting here; triples are a little hard compared to the rest of what’s going on
- 3:10.993: not particularly a big fan of the minijacks to being with for the accenting, but you’ve got a bit of a harsh left-hand bias as a result of the final [DR]
- 3:14.742: this is strange, why not just add the roll?
- 3:15.192: no need for a minijack here
- 3:21.342: you’re alternating specifically between only a kick and only a snare here; alternating singles and doubles is fine, but break the minijacks
- 3:25.092: this is a bit much
- 3:27.792: this burst is a bit unnecessary in terms of tension; you’ve got other extended bursts that you accent with just simple rolls and picking this adds substantially more stress for the fingers executing that pattern
- 3:30.492: this isn’t quite the right rhythm, but the execution is solid given that the hand tension breaks at the proper time
- 3:37.242: some noticeable missing notes
- 3:40.392: check your rhythms here, this should be a little bit faster
- 3:43.692: no need for the minijack here either
- 3:48.017: from this note on, break away from the jack as you have a descending pitch in the sampling
- 3:54.042: wouldn’t use minijacks here, still working with separate instruments unlike other locations
- 3:58.242: ^
- 4:23.086: yikes, the start of this burst is brutal and likely going to convert very badly
- 4:27.567: should be a jump
- 4:29.930: because of the burst being distributed on only three columns, this is a nasty spike because it’s a much longer sustained jack at a higher speed
- 4:41.292: nasty pattern that creates two sets of interior minijacks; staircases definitely shouldn’t be used in bursts at this speed
- 4:52.743: this burst really doesn’t capture the fullness/length of the sound
- 4:56.293: yikes, that is a nasty spike; the minijacks don’t quite work here either way
- 5:00.193: this runs all the way to the jump, shouldn’t be cut off like it is at the moment
- there’s honestly a fair bit more of the same running through to the end of the chart
- structurally, this chart needs a bit of work; rhythm usage is generally alright and there are some spots where accenting is effectively applied, but there’s too many inaccuracies for this to be queued

Wiosna - 6/10
43.092 - this is pretty rude aha, would consider using 3 note 32nd bursts instead honestly
44.292 - should be the same chord as 44.442
49.842 - feels like there should be a double here but i understand why you didn't include a double here
54.792 - i feel like this anchor should be a bit easier by making 55.902 a [12] but i understand why you did this. will leave it up to you
57.042 - should be a single
1:03.342 - should be a minijack connected to the 4th because of the synth
1:28.392/1:45.192 - hands are a bit much here, would personally suggest using a 3-2-3-2 chord pattern instead of 3-3-3-3
1:31.092 - this should be a minijumpjack based on 1:01.xxx (consecutive snares) and 1:31.992 shouldn't have minijumpjacks. you seem to be pretty inconsistent with how you use minijacks in particular so keep this in mind
1:36.192 - i think you normally make dense jumpstream with rhythms like this
1:37.392 - ow
1:42.192 - that is mean, make the 24th stream a bit easier at least
1:43.692 - way too light to justify split jumptrills
1:47.592 - would personally prefer this to be [134] instead of [124]
1:48.342 - missing double
1:49.242 - not a double, double should be on the 16th after
1:49.617 - should be a double
1:49.917 - not a double?
1:50.592 - this is pretty mean, would consider nerfing this
1:56.592 - shouldn't be a double
1:56.817 - should be a double
1:59.892/2:00.192 - shouldn't be triples
2:01.017 to 2:01.092 - missing 16ths
2:08.442/2:10.542/etc. - shouldn't be jumpjacks
2:09.492 to 2:09.942 - should be doubles?
2:14.367 - jacks should start here and not 2:14.217
2:17.142 - should not be a double
2:19.692 - left hand bias is pretty unnecessary
2:23.817 - should be a chord (triple?)
2:23.892 - ghost note
2:25.917 - missing note
2:29.517 - would rather have a double here personally but this pattern is as bit uncomfortable in general
2:29.892 - should be a [34] to demarcate the end of a snare roll
2:42.642 - unnecessary minijack here
2:45.867 - ^
3:09.342 - should be a single
3:14.742 - double seems a bit much
3:17.592 - would probably make this a [34] to cut the one hand trill
3:19.692 - considering the difficulty of the chart, the rhythm here lacks a lot of punch given the bass kicks here
3:21.342 - the minijacks here don't really work given that they're two different sounds (snare and bass kick) and minijacks give a tension that doesn't really fit two conflicting sounds. would make this something like 2[13]4[13]2[34][12] or something instead
3:23.892 to 3:24.117/etc - bass kicks, should be doubles
3:25.242 - would make this a jumptrill instead
3:27.792 - would probably make this burst start on column 2 instead
3:34.542/3:35.142 - should be a single
3:35.592 - i think these should be hands instead of quads
3:38.292 - this is uncharacteristically light for sounds like this
3:44.592 - would make this a one hand minitrill
3:48.230 - this part of the jack should on a different column, could even be a descending roll tbh
3:54.042 - minijacks seem a bit much here
3:55.092 - probably better as a triplet roll lol
3:57.717 - should be a double
3:58.242 - shouldn't be minijacks
4:04.842 - missing note

The notes here aren't exhaustive, but I think you get the idea. The chart plays fine, but the chart's use of minijacks and doubles is extremely inconsistent and there are a few difficulty spikes here and there that should be nerfed a little bit. Even though the changes here are pretty minor in the grand scheme of things, I think the fact that the chart is so long (to the point where it becomes a bit tedious) and that there are so many critiques that I don't feel too comfortable in giving this a CQ.