Dragonborn Concerto :: FFR Batch Submission
qrrbrbirbel -
Dragonborn Concerto -
Mazedude feat. Dhsu [4.25 / 10]
100+ Difficulty Batch
PublicEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
Dragonborn Concerto (qrrbrbirbel)
Note Count
1446
Chart Length
2:19
Average NPS
11.2529
Estimated Difficulty
94.51
First Note
0:10
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 30
3 - 73
4 - 118
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
13 - 39.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps
1 Second
26 - 26.00 nps
2 Seconds
45 - 22.50 nps
5 Seconds
95 - 19.00 nps
10 Seconds
173 - 17.30 nps
30 Seconds
404 - 13.47 nps
1 Minute
796 - 13.27 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
1.7s1.43s1.33s0.77s0.77s0.7s0.7s0.7s
Posted at 1:42am on September 2nd, 2020
1-framers of doom nerf
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1448 => 1446
AVG NPS changed: 11.26848 => 11.25292
Hand Bias changed: -30 => -26
Posted at 9:41pm on June 21st, 2021
TC_Halogen - 4/10
- offset is ok
- this chart feels way overdone in a lot of places
- 11.436: note is way early compared to the sound
- 50.090: 24ths are way too fast if you’re trying to accent the piano
- 52.643: opening this section out with jumps for the piano before any musical elements come into play is a bit of an indicator that it should be follow
- 52.976 to 1:08.960
- 53.726/53.892: missing notes for percussion
- 56.639: missing 32nds for the chip?
- 58.471: should be 32nds for percussion
- 1:03.743/etc: what dictates 24ths being used instead of 32nds like used earlier?
- 1:07.961: with the exception of the 48th flam which makes sense with the piano, why are the repeated 24ths here? the second instance makes sense given that there’s actually percussion right there, but the first and third don’t really correspond to anything
- 1:13.289: missing piano notes? Why are they missing from this instance of repetition only?
- 1:27.191/etc: should be 32nds, which matters in this case because 48ths being represented forces a 16th minijack for each instance
- 1:30.272/etc: are these 24ths/16ths intended to follow the bass swell?
- 1:58.409: from here on out, the chart’s downbeat is synced to a blue note
- 2:06.421 to end: jump usage gets a little inconsistent until the end of the song
- 2:13.727: this burst starts early and is extremely abrasive considering the sound that is being followed
- needs a fair bit more structural work to be acceptable
Posted at 9:42pm on June 21st, 2021
Wiosna - 4.5/10
24.339 - not sure what this staircase is going to
27.669 - this 6-note burst seems a bit much, i think a 5-note burst might be better just like how you've layered 30.666
31.831 - this little bit is a bit much given how soft the sound is, you can use 24ths i think.
32.977 - definitely too much
39.990 - really quiet sounds, bursts are a bit too much
47.981 - ^
49.187 - i think you can use 24th triplets instead of 32nds, i don't think these bursts need to be broken up from each other. the piano also doesn't justify 24ths
A lot of the chart is plagued with the issue of having bursts that are far far too soft given the sounds present. The timestamps pointed out are not exhaustive, and arguably 80% of the bursts after 49.187 aren't easily justifiable, which constitutes the bulk of the chart. The patterns aren't consistent in difficulty either, alternating from staircases to straight rolls, both of which vary wildly in difficulty. I do think that this chart could work as a lower difficulty, but as is, given that the meat of the chart are bursts to very faint sounds, the chart feels way overdone.