Dragonborn Concerto :: FFR Batch Submission
qrrbrbirbel - Dragonborn Concerto - Mazedude feat. Dhsu [4.25 / 10]
100+ Difficulty Batch
PublicEvents
Rejected
http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4732812&postcount=224
you'll feel like the dovahkin for how much shouting it'll make you do

Simfile Folder Name

Dragonborn Concerto (qrrbrbirbel)

Note Count

1446

Chart Length

2:19

Average NPS

11.2529

Estimated Difficulty

94.51

First Note

0:10

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -26

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 30 3 - 73 4 - 118

Jumps

x 153

Hands

x 44

Quads

x 1

Color Jumps

x 10

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
13 - 39.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps 1 Second
26 - 26.00 nps 2 Seconds
45 - 22.50 nps 5 Seconds
95 - 19.00 nps 10 Seconds
173 - 17.30 nps 30 Seconds
404 - 13.47 nps 1 Minute
796 - 13.27 nps

Color Count

x 469 (32.43%)
x 292 (20.19%)
x 88 (6.09%)
x 204 (14.11%)
x 80 (5.53%)
x 268 (18.53%)
x 36 (2.49%)
x 8 (0.55%)
x 1 (0.07%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.7s1.43s1.33s0.77s0.77s0.7s0.7s0.7s
35
28
21
14
7

1-framers of doom nerf

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1448 => 1446
AVG NPS changed: 11.26848 => 11.25292
Hand Bias changed: -30 => -26

TC_Halogen - 4/10
- offset is ok
- this chart feels way overdone in a lot of places
- 11.436: note is way early compared to the sound
- 50.090: 24ths are way too fast if you’re trying to accent the piano
- 52.643: opening this section out with jumps for the piano before any musical elements come into play is a bit of an indicator that it should be follow
- 52.976 to 1:08.960
- 53.726/53.892: missing notes for percussion
- 56.639: missing 32nds for the chip?
- 58.471: should be 32nds for percussion
- 1:03.743/etc: what dictates 24ths being used instead of 32nds like used earlier?
- 1:07.961: with the exception of the 48th flam which makes sense with the piano, why are the repeated 24ths here? the second instance makes sense given that there’s actually percussion right there, but the first and third don’t really correspond to anything
- 1:13.289: missing piano notes? Why are they missing from this instance of repetition only?
- 1:27.191/etc: should be 32nds, which matters in this case because 48ths being represented forces a 16th minijack for each instance
- 1:30.272/etc: are these 24ths/16ths intended to follow the bass swell?
- 1:58.409: from here on out, the chart’s downbeat is synced to a blue note
- 2:06.421 to end: jump usage gets a little inconsistent until the end of the song
- 2:13.727: this burst starts early and is extremely abrasive considering the sound that is being followed
- needs a fair bit more structural work to be acceptable

Wiosna - 4.5/10
24.339 - not sure what this staircase is going to
27.669 - this 6-note burst seems a bit much, i think a 5-note burst might be better just like how you've layered 30.666
31.831 - this little bit is a bit much given how soft the sound is, you can use 24ths i think.
32.977 - definitely too much
39.990 - really quiet sounds, bursts are a bit too much
47.981 - ^
49.187 - i think you can use 24th triplets instead of 32nds, i don't think these bursts need to be broken up from each other. the piano also doesn't justify 24ths

A lot of the chart is plagued with the issue of having bursts that are far far too soft given the sounds present. The timestamps pointed out are not exhaustive, and arguably 80% of the bursts after 49.187 aren't easily justifiable, which constitutes the bulk of the chart. The patterns aren't consistent in difficulty either, alternating from staircases to straight rolls, both of which vary wildly in difficulty. I do think that this chart could work as a lower difficulty, but as is, given that the meat of the chart are bursts to very faint sounds, the chart feels way overdone.