Shanghai Teahouse :: FFR Batch Submission
FFR Pro 21 - Shanghai Teahouse - S.S.H. [7 / 10]
Sept/Oct 2020
PublicEvents
Released
http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273002&postcount=5
Blanket permission for S.S.H.

Changes made from last submission's notes: http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4700677&postcount=2

- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Shanghai Teahouse (FFR Pro 21 & Silvuh)" vs "Shanghai Teahouse (FFR Pro 21)"

Simfile Folder Name

Shanghai Teahouse (FFR Pro 21 & Silvuh)

Note Count

1765

Chart Length

2:48

Average NPS

10.8504

Estimated Difficulty

80.84

First Note

0:05

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -11

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 60 4 - 46

Jumps

x 352

Hands

x 79

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
11 - 22.00 nps 1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps 2 Seconds
38 - 19.00 nps 5 Seconds
85 - 17.00 nps 10 Seconds
158 - 15.80 nps 30 Seconds
441 - 14.70 nps 1 Minute
832 - 13.87 nps

Color Count

x 671 (38.02%)
x 478 (27.08%)
x 52 (2.95%)
x 476 (26.97%)
x 48 (2.72%)
x 31 (1.76%)
x 8 (0.45%)
x 1 (0.06%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.57s0.57s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.43s
35
28
21
14
7

Shanghai Teahouse
-----------------
- Perms, sync, and metadata good.

- 5.484: Lower than the previous 8th.
- 11.897: Doesn't fit in your layering scheme, not part of the main electric guitar melody. On the other hand 15.158 should be followed but isn't.
- 14.506: Higher than both the next 8th and 14.180, suggest column 3.
- 15.484: Suggest moving this or the previous note off column 1 because there's no repeated sound here.
- 29.615: Guitar is ascending here & percussion isn't exactly the same in this minijack, so suggest [23][24][134].
- 48.093, 51.571, etc.: While not technically wrong, the repeated note caused by PRing to percussion here feels odd to play when there's also a melody going on in which these two notes are distinctly lower than the ones directly before. They stand out even more because you PR to the melody at 57.441.
- 53.693: [24] jump to melody wouldn't be remiss here, but I understand if you want to keep the focus on the minijack here.
- 61.897, 68.854: Missing notes
- 69.252: Should be on the 16th, not the 12th.
- 89.723: There's no repeating sound here.
- 98.528: Nice attention to detail with the PR here.
- 103.093, 104.397, 108.310, 113.093, etc.: No repeating sound here.

** I'm going to stop listing these individually here, but check your minijack usage throughout the file. Many of them are questionable, and it detracts from the "real" ones.

- 110.702: Missing jump
- 113.093: Lots of right hand bias starting here without much of a musical justification, suggest moving 113.673 to column 2 to mitigate this. You could also sneak in a jump at 113.745.
- 121.897: Missing note.
- 123.093: Another minijack where there's no repeating sound; I point this one out in particular because it's very avoidable and this is already one of the tougher parts of the chart without it.
- 127.550: This jump should be on the previous 8th.
* 129.615: Yikes. By far the toughest jack pattern in the file, please change this jump to not be one-handed (e.g. [13]).
- 159.180-159.397: Guitar is 24ths here, not 16ths.

- Fun chart with some pretty nice details put into it--I noticed some pretty attentive PR at times, and the way you escalated the layering in the second half was quite well done. However, I don't think it's *quite* ready to go in yet, and that's mostly because of the minijacks--with a song like this you can get away with fudging them a little bit, but there are some pretty glaring examples of minijacks that shouldn't be minijacks in this chart which need to be resolved first. Also, while I strongly suggest you change 129.615, I won't CQ you on it. Just be advised keeping it isn't likely to net you any points with the players. [7/10]

(A note: I'm sorry to give you a rating this much lower than the one you received last time you submitted the chart, but I truly do think that my rating is fair, and I hope my review is enough to convince you that it is too. Please DM me if there's anything I can clarify / that you'd like to discuss.)

Made changes to file as per Pizza69's notes. A couple things I do want to point out here:

- Note about 15.484 is confusing to me. To me this is saying that both the notes at 15.484 and the previous one are both in column 1 which they’re not (15.484 is in column 3 while previous note is in column 1). Need some clarification here please.
- There's nothing at 53.693, so I'm not exactly sure what jump you're mentioning here.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1759 => 1765
AVG NPS changed: 10.81352 => 10.85041
Hand Bias changed: -5 => -11

15.484: Huh, you're right. Maybe I accidentally moved it to column 1 when playing around with patterns. Sorry about that, don't worry about that note.
53.693: My bad, I meant 53.963--it's the third in a sequence of four melody notes.

That said, file's good to go--you can still make those fixes if you want, but you don't have to.