Hello Japan!!
-------------
- Permissions, sync good.
* Improper metadata: Stepartist is listed under song artist, and song artist is listed in title. Please put only the song title in the title slot, and DEV/NULL in song artist. Your name goes in "Credits" or is omitted, whichever.

- 12.659: Slightly later than it should be, the previous 96th at 12.634 is closer
- 15.456: More accurately PR'd as 42 4.
- 17.403: PR, try 324.
- 19.351-28.940: Very nice patterning, I like this a lot
* 36.057, 48.044: These minijacks feel very arbitrary. Please remove them.
- 45.122: Funky column 1 anchor starts here, not done in other instances & doesn't have any special reason to exist here. Recommend shifting 45.571 to column 2. Also column 3 at 50.666.
- 61.859: This sound starts on the 8th but is only followed here. It's faint and muddy, so I suggest removing it, but you could also fill it in with a 24th-ish rhythm.
- 62.877: Mix patterning up; this is literally a repeat of the last 4 notes, yet every sound is distinct from the last 4 notes
- 63.027: Ghost note (also, not done at 58.232)
- 68.926: 32nd, not 64th
- 70.293: I'm honestly a little surprised not to see a [12][12][12][34] type pattern here, though I can appreciate why you'd hold back. Given the other patterns in the file I don't think it would be out of place difficulty-wise if you're so inclined, but you would have to clean up the transition into it.
- 70.918: On the next 32nd (70.930)
- 71.342: Should be on 8th--if this is accenting, I don't think it works with the density
- 73.290: Nice anchor use
- 75.238: Should be a jump consistent with 75.537
- 75.531: Any reason this isn't a 64th at 75.519 like the previous instances of this sound?
- 76.286: Don't like this. You've got a 3-note 400bpm OHT here, which isn't completely unacceptable in its own right, but it does mandate lots of care in how you use it. Here the bend this follows is actually centred around the 8th, not the 32nd, and plus this sound isn't really abrasive enough for such a tough pattern imo.
- 77.672, 100.447, 136.406: Misrhythm: This 32nd is correct, but from here it's a 3/64 triplet which ends on the beat.
- 80.032, 126.629: Where at 76.286 you followed the change in sound very aggressively, here you don't follow it at all; I recommend a middle ground in each case where you just reverse the roll at the 8th or the 32nd after, e.g. 137.417.
- 80.538: This is just a 32nd triplet starting on the 16th at 80.557. Done correctly at 98.536.
- 82.430: Don't hear a minijack here
- 83.965: Lies on the 64th just before (at 83.947)
- 88.273: Remove jump at 88.198 and add jump here to make consistent with 90.520.
- 88.629: Ghost 64th
- 89.247: Ghost note
- 89.746: Flam is indistinct enough that I'd recommend just removing it, but if you keep it the 48th should be on the next 96th.
- 97.412: This is lower than the minijack and a little awkward on the same hand, recommend moving to left hand
- 102.582, 144.684, 146.632: Little bit of swing here, should be on next 64th
- 105.653: Recommend making these white notes on column 4 a colour other than white to distinguish them visually from the flams just before this.
- 133.222: This is quite heavy on the left hand, recommend changing transition out of minijacks
- 148.230: This burst should conclude at 148.342, recommend spacing out to 3/96ths so it does so.
- 149.628: At 400 bpm, this is a very aggressive pattern to end off with, suggest streamlining the OHT a little.

* Please move your coloured notes to lie where they should! You have coloured notes in a stream at 66.185. That particular one should lie on 66.198, a 13ms difference. At the song's bpm, the gap between two 24ths is 50ms. 13ms is a huge difference, almost a third of the gap!! This effect is compounded by FFR's conversion, which could mess up the gaps even more than they already are.
- Fun file ignoring technicality, but numerous inconsistencies and misrhythms pull the chart down to the point where it's not really acceptable in its current state. You made some wonderful decisions with patterning, particularly the intro when the chiptune kicks in and with the anchors in the breakcore part, but I found that when it was just jumpstream with no bursts or other gimmicks, the patterning was rather boring and indeliberate--not a huge issue, but may be something you'd like to address regardless. This chart has potential, but needs some serious polishing first. [5/10]