35
28
21
14
7
Curry Dayo! :: FFR Batch Submission
Ghost_Medley -
Curry Dayo! -
YMCK [7.5 / 10]
Sept/Oct 2020
Public
Released
http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=2034431&postcount=112
Hey Charu, I see you reading this, submit your file so we can see some fun files for FFR!
"Curry Dayo!" is from YMCK album "Family Cooking"; YMCK blanket permission attained by Jimerax in 2008.
Source thread: http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=78610
"Curry Dayo!" is from YMCK album "Family Cooking"; YMCK blanket permission attained by Jimerax in 2008.
Source thread: http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=78610
Simfile Folder Name
Curry Dayo! (Ghost_Medley)Note Count
1434Chart Length
2:21Average NPS
10.4266Estimated Difficulty
67.64
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -26
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 5Jumps
x 469
Hands
x 0
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second8 - 24.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
21 - 21.00 nps 2 Seconds
38 - 19.00 nps 5 Seconds
86 - 17.20 nps 10 Seconds
166 - 16.60 nps 30 Seconds
385 - 12.83 nps 1 Minute
714 - 11.90 nps
Color Count
x 690 (48.12%)
x 534 (37.24%)
x 4 (0.28%)
x 169 (11.79%)
x 4 (0.28%)
x 13 (0.91%)
x 0 (0%)
x 20 (1.39%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 7:45am on October 21st, 2020
The most recent iteration/edit of this file is currently being judged while the batch is still open.
Posted at 7:56am on December 3rd, 2020
Curry Dayo! (Ghost_Medley) [7.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> Chart is on Challenge difficulty.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
-[00:03.903 & 00:09.236] Other instances of this particular sound are accompanied by 3 64th notes, but these ones are only accompanied by 2 64th notes. I would suggest moving the sets of 3 64th notes, down to 2 64th notes considering that’s how they are portrayed during the solo, and it’s hard to accommodate sets of 3 in the solo.
-[00:15.903] I understand how the first 8th at 00:14.070 was dropped (it was particularly quiet and negligible), but the 8th here is particularly strong, shows up on waveform, and the current PR progression would follow suit with it being a left arrow here. It’s also the only instance where this 8th is dropped in this section.
-[00:39.903] What’s the significance of the 8th here being a 8th jack paired with the [13] jump here? If none, should probably be moved to the right column.
-[00:45.903 -> 00:47.736] Pacing here for jumps to vocals seems quite awkward for the entry into this section. Feels like there was initially a feel for how this section should be, and wasn’t established until 00:48.070, but the stuff in this timestamp was left in. 8th at 00:46.070 should be a jump, and the [13] 4th at 00:47.236 should be a single, while the 8th after it at 00:47.403 should be a jump.
-[00:56.570] Same situation as the above nope happens here.
-[01:33.903 & 01:44.570] Repeat note from the previous two above notes.
-Fairly consistent, somewhat clean. Could use some fix-ups here & there, but safe to go in as-is. I would suggest perhaps a general clean-up of 8ths getting placed as paired jacks from other 8th jumps, as they appear to happen sporadically in favor of using other patterns that might be a better fit for the section. It’s quite noticeable especially during the chorus, but it doesn’t necessarily hamper the playability of the file given the difficulty peak from two 16th sections in the file.