Lost Forever :: FFR Batch Submission
T-Force -
Lost Forever -
HammyMcSquirrel [8 / 10]
Sept/Oct 2020
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Lost Forever (FFR Cut) [other] (T-Force)" vs "Lost Forever (T-Force)"
Simfile Folder Name
Lost Forever (FFR Cut) [other] (T-Force)
Note Count
658
Chart Length
2:18
Average NPS
4.8418
Estimated Difficulty
29.65
First Note
0:02
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 1
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
5 - 15.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
7 - 14.00 nps
1 Second
11 - 11.00 nps
2 Seconds
18 - 9.00 nps
5 Seconds
38 - 7.60 nps
10 Seconds
68 - 6.80 nps
30 Seconds
169 - 5.63 nps
1 Minute
318 - 5.30 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
1.17s1.17s0.97s0.97s0.8s0.77s0.77s0.77s
Posted at 7:39am on November 19th, 2020
Lost Forever [other] (FFR Cut) 8
Other than the notes on the other version, the additional notes that apply here are:
19.404 etc. - not sure about these minijacks when the melody is ascending
33.920 etc. - on the other hand, might this (and the following 4th be better served sharing the same column? Acutally kinda ambivalent on this one, because although PR-wise that is technically correct, I kinda like the fun feel of them changing columns better.
55.984 could move off this column for PR with the previous one imo
61.017 same as above but as jumps - shared jump here but the 2nd jump is higher melody-wise
this ^ repeats
Rejected per note left on this page to only accept one of these; the other version is slightly stronger and stepfile author has noted that they prefer it too. But both were definitely good enough to get in, so just leaving the score to also reflect that :)