Arche :: FFR Batch Submission
DarkZtar - Arche - Camellia [4.75 / 10]
100+ Difficulty Batch
PublicEvents
Rejected
http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4707066&postcount=1
I regret nothing.

Simfile Folder Name

Arche (DarkZtar)

Note Count

3298

Chart Length

2:52

Average NPS

19.6271

Estimated Difficulty

106.47

First Note

0:04

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 26

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 135 3 - 378 4 - 764

Jumps

x 677

Hands

x 60

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 37

Color Hands

x 2

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
13 - 39.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
17 - 34.00 nps 1 Second
30 - 30.00 nps 2 Seconds
54 - 27.00 nps 5 Seconds
126 - 25.20 nps 10 Seconds
241 - 24.10 nps 30 Seconds
694 - 23.13 nps 1 Minute
1302 - 21.70 nps

Color Count

x 881 (26.71%)
x 736 (22.32%)
x 88 (2.67%)
x 865 (26.23%)
x 24 (0.73%)
x 448 (13.58%)
x 32 (0.97%)
x 50 (1.52%)
x 174 (5.28%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.43s0.3s0.27s0.2s0.17s0.17s0.17s0.17s
35
28
21
14
7

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 3287 => 3298
AVG NPS changed: 19.56159 => 19.62706
Hand Bias changed: 25 => 26

TC_Halogen - 4.5/10
- offset is good
- structure is really lacking in restraint in certain sections, and this lack of restraint also kinda creates convoluted structures where many sounds, even insignificant ones, are represented with similar rhythms (32nds) -- there’s no real precedence given for what you want to give attention to
- chart is ridiculously front-loaded in terms of difficulty
- there are some nice liberties taken with representing certain synths with 64th/192nd coloring, which is nice, but the bursts are fast enough and have enough notes at times to create frame issues
- the song cuts aren’t the greatest; apart from the fade, the first cut creates a random 6/4 measure and all cuts basically transition into releases with no buildups, which is rough
- not a fan

Wiosna - 5/10
5.303/5.603/5.903 - seems overemphasised, doubles would've sufficed
10.778 - 32nd doesn't really fit very well here especially given the minijack right after
19.778 - timbre doesn't quite justify a burst this fast
21.240 - 32nd shouldn't be here, not sure about the 32nd burst at 21.278 in general
22.178 - why a continuous burst here? the sound is pretty muted
22.928 - timbre doesn't quite justify a burst this fast
24.803 - can't tell what the 32nd burst here is going to

There are a lot of 32nd bursts throughout the chart that go to bass wobbles that I really feel should be toned down or omitted because they feel very excessive to play. Unfortunately the bursts constitute a very large portion of the chart, so the chart feels very gratuitous overall. The fact that you used 32nd bursts for almost every sound gives the chart a lot less detail than it could've had as well. There are a lot of 40th (?) bursts that have similar issues with how the sound is quite soft and the burst doesn't really complement the sound nicely.

The jacks are generally fine and the non-burst parts are overall alright, though I probably would give the dense jumpstream a bit more detail rather than just making it mostly a jumptrill. The flute part is executed alright, though you can definitely tone down some of the trills in that part. Regardless, the bursts being as excessive as they are makes this a very homogeneous and overbearing experience.