TC_Halogen - 5.5/10
- offset is fine
- overall, I’d like to see improved pitch relevance that targets the more melodic structures of things in the opening
- 33.640: missing jump? you’d of course have to flip the pattern a bit to leave the [UR][LD] that comes later
- 37.328/37.390: should be jumps here; in general, your precedence seems to (and should) lean towards fuller percussion accents, and there’s plenty of them to dictate a solid layering
- 38.078: remove the R from this jump here to better accent the hi-hats coming before that
- 42.328: noticeably different tonality from the snares here, so breaking them up instead of leaving them the same could be a bit more viable
- 48.078: what you’re accenting here should be a full stream, not broken
- 52.578: this sound effect gets accented with jumps pretty consistently, but it is also surrounded by a lot of jumps as well which gives it a bit less of an effect -- it’s worth making stand out, in my opinion
- 54.578: this stream of triples isn’t quite right; that extremely deep kick that you occasionally accent through doesn’t play straight 8th notes here
- 56.828: there -seems- to be an idea behind this color gimmick? it doesn’t feel entirely consistent in the application, but the separation feels like it has some sensibilities
- 1:11.577: not sure why this particular instance is a triple compared to the rest of your section
- 1:18.577: some missing 16ths here
- 1:20.077: at the start of the section, you make a sensible decision to open up with heavy accenting on 4th notes with triples, but seem to pull away from that at 1:21.327 and it never really returns
- 1:24.202: this would have been an appropriate place to break the accent, to assign the color gimmick that you utilized at 48.078, since it’s the same sound
- 1:26.077: from here (disregarding your coloring adjustments), you’ve got two layers of percussion: one that plays six notes 3/32 apart consistently with the first one being 1:26.077 -- and another that plays on 1:26.327, and wherever the 8th would be after without the color gimmick
- 1:33.702: this triple can be removed pretty safely
- 1:43.827: can definitely add a jump at the tip of this trill ([UR] will work just fine)
- 1:47.952: don’t be afraid to constrain patterns when you’re given an opportunity here; you could follow the structure you opened the section out with and effectively leverage trills for the hi-hat while still getting your desired layering structure; simply changing your [DU] to a R would solve that, though I’d argue there are more comfortable ways to maintain accenting
- 1:51.015: missing hi-hat
- 1:52.202: technically should be 32nds, but you can justify this with the fading in of the percussion -- realistically, to get the best fade-in effect, you really shouldn’t main the streaming 16ths after the [LD]
- 2:00.827: shouldn’t be broken, same as 48.078
- 2:08.077: another instance where the triples feel a bit too heavy-handed
- this file’s certainly got ideas, but the structure doesn’t quite feel as consistent as it should be; there are numerous instances where certain instruments within the same section are accented multiple ways, and not necessarily out of convenience for squeezing in patterns -- it just seems a bit inconsistent in application throughout.

Wiosna - 5.5/10
35.328 - missing double
35.703 - ^
36.286 - feel that this note in particular can be removed because the sounds that you're trying to follow here are two distinct sounds, and breaking the burst up would help a lot in that respect
37.328/37.390 - should be doubles; i know that you intentionally made these singles (and rhythms like this would make a OH minitrill), but you can afford some heavier layering here.
37.453 - shouldn't be a double
50.203 - missing double
51.078/51.318 - feel that these should be layered
54.578 - this seems a bit excessive given how soft the bass kicks are, you can do a 3-1-3-1-3-1 chordglut or 3-2-3-2-3-2 instead
1:05.077 - i don't think there's a particularly strong need to make this an anchor connected to the [34]
1:06.077 - these i think would make more sense as doubles
1:09.452 - really odd gap here, you can place a note here for sure
1:13.577 - missing double
1:14.202 - similar to before, i don't think that there's a need to create an anchor with the [13] before it
1:14.577 - should be a double
1:20.577/1:20.827 - shouldn't be triples
1:23.202 - maybe missing double
1:23.577 - burst starting from here should be a bit slower than 32nds
1:25.327 - i think this should be on [234] to avoid an egregiously long anchor on the left hand, this also involves moving the [23] to something like [13]
1:27.202 - double seems unnecessary here
1:28.827 - should be a triple
1:29.827 - can probably be 24ths
1:32.577 - refer to 54.578

There's a couple more errors in the last breakcore section, but you get the idea. The chart needs a lot of cleanup. It plays okay (though there's a lot of anchoring that I'm personally not fond of), but it has a lot of structural errors and is pretty sloppily executed in general.