Mystical Wheelbarrow Journey :: FFR Batch Submission
klimtkiller - Mystical Wheelbarrow Journey - cardboard box [5.5 / 10]
100+ Difficulty Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedEvents
Rejected

Simfile Folder Name

Mystical Wheelbarrow Journey (klimtkiller)

Note Count

2233

Chart Length

2:15

Average NPS

16.8274

Estimated Difficulty

102.64

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 17

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 1 3 - 214 4 - 403

Jumps

x 312

Hands

x 14

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 49

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
12 - 36.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
17 - 34.00 nps 1 Second
28 - 28.00 nps 2 Seconds
51 - 25.50 nps 5 Seconds
117 - 23.40 nps 10 Seconds
234 - 23.40 nps 30 Seconds
700 - 23.33 nps 1 Minute
1287 - 21.45 nps

Color Count

x 485 (21.72%)
x 191 (8.55%)
x 608 (27.23%)
x 250 (11.2%)
x 124 (5.55%)
x 476 (21.32%)
x 6 (0.27%)
x 0 (0%)
x 93 (4.16%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.8s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.43s0.43s0.4s
35
28
21
14
7

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Title changed: unknown => Mystical Wheelbarrow Journey
----------

TC_Halogen - 5.5/10
- offset is good
- concept in the intro is… ok? layering occasionally makes things quite heavy but I do respect what you were going for in this case
- 21.827: why does the roll break apart here?
- i’m not much of a fan of the 32nd stream here; the patterning is just kinda plain and doesn’t give a huge amount of attention to detail with respect to melodic repetition, likely for the purpose of keeping it fluent -- there are some instances of attention to the descending scales, but overall it’s just kinda meh
- 1:03.141: this reduction in difficulty is very counter-intuitive; with the chiptune melody actually being an unbroken 48th note stream, you could afford to smooth the difficulty curve by utilizing 24ths the entire time and just leveraging a different layering structure as opposed to forcing it out the first time
- 1:31.941/etc: if the idea is to retain the previous layering structure while adding the 24ths on top, it’s not quite doing it properly; jumps feel like they’re missing in the first instance as later instances have 12th jumps for all of the notable melodic elements as opposed to arbitrarily being left out
- 2:09.434: breaking your own call-and-response concept here with the white note patterning being different than the properly colored one
- the structure on this is a bit off putting to me, mostly because of the massive 32nd stream being used and transitioned into something substantially easier for no real reason

Wiosna - 5.5/10
12.627 - not really big into the idea of layering both of the melodies together, it's really hard to follow what's going on in this section exactly
21.313 - you can definitely do something more varied than just a 48th roll here

a lot of the 32nd stream is mostly arbitrary so i won't say much there. i can definitely see some effort in making some of the streams descending based on the descending synths which i do appreciate, but the streams are mostly designed for playability more than anything here. it's fine, but nothing notable

1:03.141 - this is a weird decrease in difficulty because the synths are still very notable and there's an additional melody here. you can probably get away with using a dense 24th JS here instead of a stream, though i know that you patterned this with 12th minijacks to give this more accenting power. i just don't think that it's quite enough
1:14.455 - why is there a minijack here?

really not fond of the 24th jumpstreams at the end. it's really hard to tell what they're going to, the patterns are unnecessarily difficult, and i don't think that they really fit the section. a lighter approach would be a lot better here, but that'd also mess up the difficulty curve of the chart. the parts with just 12ths should be all doubles as well given your layering approach.

For a chart as simply structured as this, I do think that you have to get the core elements of the chart bang on. There are, however, a lot of sections here that I was really uncertain about, and the main section of the chart is just okay. All in all I can't quite say that this is something that I'd accept in any case.