TC_Halogen - 7.5/10
- offset is fine
- 8.127: not necessarily incorrect, but I think it’s better as 24ths here, the sound is not quite as prevalent but does have enough into it to be deserving as a “pace-setting” accent, if you will
- 10.070: what you’re following here doesn’t quite start as 32nds, it starts as 24ths
- 16.308: this sequence feels like it’s a bit much - given that it’s a lot of short sampling, some notes feel like they can be omitted up to the jump at 16.581
- 19.490: not quite the same pitch as the next note there
- 30.945/32.399: etc
- 49.854: anchor on [L] is a liiiiiiiittle rough; it works, but I think you can accent this a bit better given that the descending bit starts on the second beat
- 54.399: noticeable missing note here
- 58.481: should not be a continue burst here; it’s actually x-xxxxx-x (32nds); you might be able to get away this a little better if you utilize 24ths instead (and colored 24ths where your greens are as well) -- as is, this is pretty abrasive
- 1:01.002: there’s a bit of a noticeable chop on the sampling here, might be worth chopping off the last note
- 1:07.038: check the rhythm on this, what you have is a little on the early side
- 1:10.581: starting the 24th stream here somewhat reduces the accenting that you have on the bass wobble which seems to start at 1:10.854 -- you could potentially use 16ths up into that which will give you a solid pace and a good contrast for when it actually kicks off
- 1:15.183: this is a bit shorter of a buzz, chop the last note off here to get a good separation
- 1:17.365: remove
- 1:19.547: another note that could potentially be removed because of the buzz being a bit shorter, not quite as necessary here though
- 1:27.763: this section could have been a whole hell of a lot worse had you not used restraint and brought all of the chips down to 24ths instead, so good job thinking a bit more carefully about how this should be paced
- 1:31.513/1:31.649/1:31.786: some missing 16ths here
- 1:49.581: this might be better suited as just a backwards roll, since it’s a pretty cleanly descending sound
- 2:10.237: feels a bit off as a jump here
- 2:11.328: this as well
- 2:15.828: minijack would be here (i.e. your current minijack is a 16th too early), though I do feel the sounds are a little too faint to really leverage minijacks here
- 2:16.374: this is a little nasty -- might be easier with a pattern rework on the 24ths so that the 32nd burst is a little easier to transition into
- 2:21.964: this jumpstream feels very rolly for quite a long time; I do respect the fact that the direction/fluency of the jumpstreams is felt, but the patterns could probably be reworked a bit better while still accenting things (maybe you could go in and out of split trills and one-handed trills or something?)
- 2:49.374: OOF that’s mean after everything in the chart
- this chart’s actually pretty well done overall, just needs some tweaks on finer points.

Wiosna - 7/10
WHY DO SO MANY PEOPLE SEND MASHCORE

but now that we have that out of the way:
1.990 - missing double
2.808 - probably should be a shorter burst
4.718 - shouldn't start on column 4 for sure because of the anchor, you should start on column 3 instead
5.604 - can't tell what the 16th here goes to
5.672 - same as 2.808
8.127 - probably better as a 24th burst given the wobble
11.263/11.399 - would make [14] instead of [24] because of the anchor you create with [23]s
12.081 - you can probably sneak a minijack somewhere for this
16.377 - you can probably omit this 16th? the double gives a lot of stress to this burst as is. gives you more room to place the burst that starts on the 8th too
27.763 - there's a 16th rhythm here
49.854 - the anchor is a bit mean aha, would try to break up the anchor here or just shorten it in general
53.399 - i think this is a continuous 8th rhythm here and not a gallop here
58.581 - would make this a 24th split roll instead, the buzz here fits 24ths more
1:10.581 - the bass wobble gets particularly strong at 1:10.717, so you should start the stream here instead. maybe place a 16th after the 4th rather than use 24ths before 1:10.717 to show that?
1:13.990 - missing double etc.
1:16.172 - same as 2.808
1:22.581/etc - these jumpstreams have very very few anchors and are in general, very rolly. given how easy the jumpstreams are, you can definitely make the patterns a lot harder with either more aggressive layering (e.g. doubles on 1:22.990, 1:25.581, etc.) and less rolly patterns in general. the bursts and additional layering is mostly fine otherwise.
1:49.581 - i think a more explicitly descending 24th roll would work better here
1:52.172 - would probably try to make this a split roll to contrast it with the green roll
2:11.737 - shouldn't be a double
2:12.146 - there should definitely be some minijack somewhere
2:13.237 - this seems a bit much, would make this a 24th stream and 2:13.510 onwards a 16th stream
2:13.919 - missing 32nd burst, you can make 2:14.055 a single
2:14.601 - you can probably make these 16ths and make this a minijack
2:15.283 - should be a double
2:15.555 - doesn't seem harsh enough to justify a minijack
2:16.374 - would probably make this a roll (14321) instead of a split roll here, this is a bit spiky
2:21.964/3:01.237 - similar issues to 1:22.581, the patterns i think are a bit too rolly at places. in this i think you have to make the patterns harder though rather than buffing the section's layering. OH minitrills and stuff would be cool.
2:49.374 - nerf this roll please, this is really hard

Chart is decent overall. There are some bits that play a bit off because of how hard some of the bursts are and there are some places where it could be a bit harder, but the chart is fine. CQ because I would like clarification on some of these points and maybe some changes to the jumpstreams and bursts.