BadAzz :: FFR Batch Submission
100+ Difficulty Batch
PublicTokenEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
BadAzz (qrrbrbirbel)
Note Count
4541
Chart Length
5:28
Average NPS
13.9623
Estimated Difficulty
99.78
First Note
0:02
Ending Note Delay
0:04
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 3
2 - 25
3 - 486
4 - 697
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
11 - 33.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps
1 Second
28 - 28.00 nps
2 Seconds
49 - 24.50 nps
5 Seconds
113 - 22.60 nps
10 Seconds
200 - 20.00 nps
30 Seconds
560 - 18.67 nps
1 Minute
1065 - 17.75 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
3.37s2.63s1.67s1.47s1.43s1.2s0.73s0.53s
Posted at 2:24am on July 29th, 2020
"this file contains 1 hold" >:(
Posted at 9:24pm on June 21st, 2021
TC_Halogen - 4/10
- offset is fine
- the opening could be accented more effectively than just triples, both for accenting the duration of notes but also for layering in the “flute” or whatever it’s supposed to be
- 22.831: these little flourishes are nice accents to help your structure
- 22.951/24.151/etc: missing notes, listen carefully
- 28.471/29.910: if there’s a note here, it’s under-pronounced and might be better just omitting
- 32.667 to 47.547: definitely a number of missing notes for either bass or percussion, stuff could definitely be filled in a bit more consistently here
- 48.507: should be a triple according to your structure -- you even have triples mid 32nd stream later on, so no reason to omit here if you want it
- 1:19.492: 24th minijack there is pretty rough, oof
- 1:19.692: ghost note
- 1:20.932: this is just a nasty pattern in general; the right hand is squeezing in five alternating notes faster in less than an 8th, and it leads into a left-handed trill that transitions pretty poorly
- 1:36.552: pretty tight up arrow anchor here.
- 1:38.212: same as 1:20.932
- it takes about two minutes to get a noticeably different song structure not including the breakdown repeating “Sephiroth”, but the chart structure really remains just as heavy-handed as before and doesn’t offer a huge difference; even with new melodic elements introducing themselves, the structure does not change much
- 2:24.852: you were able to justify some 32nd note usage with the deeper basses, but it’s definitely not going to pass here
- 2:32.532: no
- not really going to keep droning on with details; the song ends up essentially having repetition melodically and feels like it goes on forever, and the chart doesn’t really fight the redundancy much
Posted at 9:24pm on June 21st, 2021
Wiosna - 4/10
31.711 to 32.548 - sounds are pretty soft given the anchors here
48.027 - should be a stream here based on your chart structure
49.947 - really not a fan of the burst structure here... the first bass wobble is pretty soft but the second bass wobble is more pronounced, so the 32nds to the first bass wobble should either be slower or the 32nds to the second bass wobble should have harder patterns. i'd suggest the former personally. this is extremely pertinent throughout the chart
1:01.467 - this is way too hard to hit
1:19.092 - there are two discrete sounds here, so i don't think a full stream here works
1:20.932 - burst doesn't really make sense here, the attacks are on the 4th and 8th respectively, but the burst speeds up on the 16ths. this happens a lot in the chart
1:36.612 - ow
1:38.772 - really no reason to have continuous streams for a bass wobble this soft
2:08.052 - this anchor is a bit much
2:08.532 - ^
2:15.732 - wobble is too soft to justify 24ths i think
2:24.852 - not sure what the 32nds here go to, and the one hand trills are really gratuitous here
2:32.532 - these jacks are pretty excessive, trills would be better
The chart drags a lot, and I think that has a lot to do with the song choice more than anything. There's a lot of structural issues in the chart as well, especially with the bursts being on the excessive side for the most part.