A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1881 => 1886
AVG NPS changed: 12.59879 => 12.63228
Hand Bias changed: -13 => -8

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1886 => 1874
AVG NPS changed: 12.63228 => 12.55191

TC_Halogen - 6/10
- offset looks good, though as a result of something, your chart goes 10ms late after 8.606 for a little before coming back on sync later -- resolve this accordingly
- 6.276: in general, these rhythms used for the sound effect you’re following can definitely be tightened up
- 6.746: missing note
- 7.166: this whole sequence seems to kinda mesh together because of the 1432 repetition; vary up your patterns a bit more
- 7.866/etc: not a fan of this jump utilization given the rest of the chart’s structure; these sounds feel a bit more insignificant and are given more accenting attention
- 11.725: missing jump?
- 13.525: sensible pattern usage here, but it’s quite tough to play; this might be more comfortable if the anchor was on an outer column and you spread the patterns a bit more evenly between hands
- 15.265: missing 32nd? (like the ones at 6.626 and 14.305)
- 15.385: almost missing 32nd, like 6.746
- 22.104/etc: missing 32nd; this is really noticeable due to the fact that you have an empty space after the jump when there’s clearly a sound right after, making it a bit more of a notable anomaly to have it missing and this happens throughout the chart
- 27.864: missing 32nd
- 30.564: why does the burst cut off?
- 32.123: some missing jumps here? These are more noticeable percussive accents that can definitely be given attention; adding layering isn’t really going to boost the difficulty much when the primary difficulty is centralized around bursts and transition control
- 35.963/etc: what are these jumps intending to accent that makes them stand out in these spots?
- 37.283/etc: missing 48ths (like 36.323?) - this happens a few times
- 39.983: missing note, also happens a few times
- 40.553: missing 64th
- 1:06.680: this feels a bit overdone
- 1:10.680: this feels quite a bit underdone, especially given that you’re accenting percussion like this with jumps just a moment before this
- 1:17.319: a bit of a tight pattern here creating a 24th minijack at 125 BPM
- 1:32.028: that’s a bit nasty, yikes
- 1:32.598: also deceptively difficult beat here, because there’s so much stress on an inner column while juggling around it; better pattern distribution could make that a bit more comfortable
- 1:47.996: watch your patterning here; not a huge amount of reason for a 24th minijack
- 2:03.555: filthy transition here; huge amount of stress onto the right hand and by the time the player has any time to recover, they’re getting absolutely bombed by bursts
- 2:24.673: pretty rough to do right at the end of the song with that 500 BPM equivalent burst
- this file needs some structural polishing; it’s not necessarily bad, but it could most certainly be tuned up in a number of places -- layering needs to be more consistent and instruments that are being followed need to be done so a bit more attentively

Wiosna - 5.5/10
6.198 - weird burst here, shouldn't this be continuous?
7.166/7.496 - two different sounds here, yet the patterns are more or less the same and blend into each other into a giant split jumptrill. feel that this would be a lot better if the first burst is more rolly rather than split rolly (or the other way round)
11.725 - should be a double given your current layering scheme
12.445 - definitely feels like there needs to be more accenting here for this sound
13.885 - really nasty transition because there's already so much strain on the left hand, also this burst is a lot differently layered compared to 6.198 and 7.166
20.685 - this seems a tad overlayered
32.123 - this seems pretty underlayered given how prominent the bass kicks are, plus i think you did something at about 13.xxx to accent this
35.603 - pattern should be a bit more aggressive than a straight roll given how you layered this chart
48.092 - feel that this should create a minijack with the note after at least given how loud the bass kicks are
49.162 - burst should definitely continue from here
53.482 - same as 48.092
57.801 - given that this burst blends into the burst before it both visually and kinaesthetically, you should probably pattern this 3-note burst slightly differently like a OH minitrill or something
1:00.561 - this seems way overlayered, i think that gallops would be fine but 3-note bursts for these sounds in particular are very excessive
1:05.720 - missing burst
1:06.800 - 3-note burst here is unnecessary given how faint this sound is
1:07.400 - missing 3-note 32nd burst
1:31.358 - i don't think having an anchor on 1 is really necessary here heh, this is already straining enough on the left hand with the pattern right after
1:32.858 - feel that a rolly 32nd pattern here would be better given how light the sound is. an anchor seems unnecessary
1:34.457 - this is a really difficult transition. i think it's because of the notes before the [23] chord -- the burst there seems really excessive given how soft the sound is. this happens very often in this section
double usage seems really really all over the place here in general.
1:35.867 - given how you've been layering doubles, this shouldn't be a double
1:39.317 - this burst is a bit excessive given the sound here
1:49.456 - ^
1:51.346 - should create a minijack with the 4th
2:03.915 - ow

The jump use in this is extremely inconsistent. I know that you're using doubles for the metallic clangy sounds, but there are many occasions where you use doubles for bass kicks or snares for not much reason. I feel that beefing up the chart's layering wouldn't be much of a problem, so you can definitely do that. There are also a lot of technical errors littered throughout the chart along with some really unjustifiably difficult patterns, the ones that I pointed out are not exhaustive. The chart overall I think has some potential, but I think it needs a lot of cleanup for it to be within acceptable range.