TC_Halogen - 7/10
- offset is fine
- 5.077/etc: why is this particular note ignored with respect to layering?
- 11.191/etc: flam should come after, not before the 4th
- 57.782/58.872: missing note
- 1:01.941: not a fan of the triple which forces the minijack in this case, given the rest of the difficulty of the file
- 1:03.986/1:06.441: 16ths falling on the 8th note are a part of the layering/structure of your file, so it shouldn’t be left out here
- 1:12.441/etc: should be xx-xx for jumps like the previous instance; honestly, the xx-xx jumps really should be a primary motif for this section given that you open out with it and it also makes the most sense when correlating to the music
- 1:14.213: when dealing with these bursts, only the last hit is truly pronounced in a good majority of them -- removing a few jumps could improve the playability of this section drastically
- 1:14.486: there’s a pretty clear separation in the overtoning here, a continuous burst isn’t the best choice
- 1:17.759/1:18.032: see 1:14.213
- 1:19.395: having this extended jumptrill burst open with a triple is quite possibly the least ergonomic thing that you could do here
- 1:21.713: see 1:14.213
- 1:22.804: consider the motion being made here: these flams are most likely going to be approached/executed as jumps, which not only creates jumpgluts but also a really heavy stress on the right hand with a connected outer-column minijack
- 1:28.872: ghost note
- 1:37.668: you could probably get away with removing the jump here as the bass doesn’t play
- 1:54.168: you utilize this 48th burst later in the section without the forced minijack, so fix that here as well
- the approach to this chart isn’t that bad; it could definitely use some toning down, but I’d honestly like to give it a chance because it’s got a good mix between physical requirement and solid finesse

Wiosna - 6/10
Regarding the dense jumpstreams: there are a lot of extended spurts of one hand trilly patterns which I didn't think are all that appropriate, so I would suggest nerfing those for sure.

The burst section is fair to play, but I'm pretty agnostic to it in general.

I feel that the section from 1:28.122 to 1:45.577 is pretty excessively layered; particularly the double use. Given how soft the guitar is, I would expect a much lighter section here. Maybe go for just layering snares or some parts of the guitar. Layering both at the same time I don't think works here. The section after is fine, though I don't think 48th bursts work for the sound that you're following.

Overall I don't really have a strong opinion of this chart one way or another. It reminds me of a more fair Tool-Assisted Speedcore, but I really don't think that file should've been accepted in the first place. This seems... fine, but I'll delegate whether the file should go on or be CQ'd or whatever to other judges.

Fixes based on notes. I also took the 'tone it down' to heart and nerfed the difficulty peaks in the file (namely, the longer split jumptrills in 16th dense js going back to [12][34] jumptrills and the 48ths in bursts dialed back to flam jumps). I kept a pair of [14][23] split jumptrills in the 16th dense js sections, but made sure there was no complicated intro/exit into them, and reserved for measure transitions/file symmetry since that measure transition only happens once in each iteration of 16th dense js.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2796 => 2799
AVG NPS changed: 17.80514 => 17.82424
Hand Bias changed: -10 => -9

Oh, and thanks again immensely for the notes! It was a massive help~

File should be much more bearable now, it was a pain to re-work this file from 2014 lol.