Village Beautification in 5-4 :: FFR Batch Submission
qrrbrbirbel - Village Beautification in 5-4 - Patrick Burns [7 / 10]
May/June 2020
Rejected
http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4732812&postcount=224 perms

Simfile Folder Name

Village Beautification In 5-4 (qrrbrbirbel)

Note Count

2264

Chart Length

4:28

Average NPS

8.5434

Estimated Difficulty

62.3

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 38

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 1 4 - 20

Jumps

x 552

Hands

x 8

Quads

x 1

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
8 - 16.00 nps 1 Second
15 - 15.00 nps 2 Seconds
26 - 13.00 nps 5 Seconds
57 - 11.40 nps 10 Seconds
114 - 11.40 nps 30 Seconds
321 - 10.70 nps 1 Minute
627 - 10.45 nps

Color Count

x 445 (19.66%)
x 760 (33.57%)
x 44 (1.94%)
x 672 (29.68%)
x 4 (0.18%)
x 215 (9.5%)
x 8 (0.35%)
x 88 (3.89%)
x 28 (1.24%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.8s0.8s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.4s0.27s
35
28
21
14
7

- offset is fine
- pitch relevance could use a little bit of work but it’s not the worst thing ever; compared to previous submissions, this is a noticeably better attempt
- i’m a bit thrown off by the earlier color gimmicks and the gimmicks at 2:48ish (same thing)
- the later instance of color gimmicks are a bit more intelligent (starting at 1:28) because it kinda emphasizes that 3/4 time signature a bit better and also keeps things red on each time signature, which is often a problem when you opt into snapping to 16ths for something like this
- 16.887: should be 32nds
- 26.445/29.100/etc: missing jumps for snare?
- 58.569: make this a different jump so that the kick is better separated from the ride cymbal at 58.170
- 1:09.719: missing gentle hi-hat note here; there are others
- 1:26.445: same layering of strings as earlier; triple isn’t necessary
- 1:37.861/etc: this just looks incorrect; the patterning is so much more jarring while accommodating for the boost in layering and there’s not much to justify the occasional repetition
- 1:50.471: missing note
- 1:58.569: again, I understand the boost in structure, it’s just not a good visual representation
- 2:01.223: appears to be a misplaced jump
- 2:10.250: can’t find anything within the music, even at lower rates, that accommodates for these 24ths -- the echoes in the instrumentation don’t quite line up with it either
- 2:21.666 to 2:22.728: start w/ a [LU] and then [LR], alternating for pitch -- it’ll be more accurate to the first of the three jumps that happens before as it’s the same pitch
- 2:35.737: missing jump (it seems like the the bass was a component used for making the jumps), though structurally, it seems like the bass stops being followed as a use of jumps mid-phrase
- 2:56.445: remove jump
- interesting attempt at something; it’s not bad, but the color gimmick structure might be a bit too ambiguous for anyone to determine beyond just random coloring -- structurally, it could be polished a little bit more

Addressed all notes listed except the color theory. i couldnt think of an alternative color scheme with my limited brain power so i left it as is. hopefully the 'beautification' in the name is enough to convince people the colors be worthy ^_^

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2263 => 2264
AVG NPS changed: 8.53962 => 8.5434
Hand Bias changed: 27 => 38

offset seems to have shifted from proper to 15ms off?

file looks a bit better, but i'm struggling to really bring this into acceptance territory as a result of the unexplainable color gimmick earlier on.

this is a situation where definitely seek another judge for the purpose of an appeal as you're within the range and i've been the one to judge the file in both instances.

We can actually just table the submission for right now, cuz I have to switch laptops just to edit files now lol (amongst other deadlines i need to meet)

I also want to find a good way to express the 5/4 time signature in the mentioned sections so back to the semi-drawing board! ^_^

Moving to rejected since no other update has been made in the allotted timeframe Will need to be submitted to a new batch.