Small fixes to PR and removed some anchors

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2652 => 2653
AVG NPS changed: 14.05405 => 14.05935
Hand Bias changed: 0 => 1

Fixed hand bias~

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Hand Bias changed: 1 => -1

Missing hand

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2653 => 2654
AVG NPS changed: 14.05935 => 14.06465
Hand Bias changed: -1 => 0

Various fixes

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2654 => 2653
AVG NPS changed: 14.06465 => 14.05935
Hand Bias changed: 0 => -3

- offset’s good
- 9.373: should be a triple according to your layering scheme
- 11.557/etc: because of how heavy your layering structure is, you don’t have an opportunity to accent the change in percussion here
- 12.722: this note is better on L to follow the kicks, since there’s only two hits (leaving it where it is now makes a visual implication of three notes when there’s not)
- 15.053: similar situation as 12.722, try to prevent unnecessary repetition
- 18.730: missing 64th
- 28.014: triple should only be a double (same as 21.023, 23.354, 25.684, etc)
- 33.839: this is a good build-up given your layering structure
- 35.004: missing triple? this one’s hard to tell, but given that you’re in a buildup here, you could likely get away with adding it pretty easily
- as far as a semi-dumpy dubstep drop goes, you did a pretty solid job on the patterning and general execution of burst placement, it feels right to play and effectively accents the music
- 40.247/etc: these one-handed trills were a bold but excellent choice: what I’d suggest to you is to alternate in and out of right-handed trilling so that players can’t simply mirror their way out of playing it
- 51.897: missing triple
- 1:02.674: when you’ve got a clearly audible sound like this one, try to accent it in a way that heavily deviates from your semi-dumpy structure, otherwise it kinda gets lost
- 1:05.805: there’s a missing synth note right above this, sounds like 5/192 from it
- 1:11.994: see 1:02.674
- 1:13.742: move off of L to get better accenting on the bass
- 1:28.179: change jump to not have R on it; your structure following the bass actually has repeating notes in it so this appears slightly erroneous
- 1:32.091: ^
- 1:43.742: direct copy/paste from the first half of the phrase
- 1:53.062 to 2:02.383: this section isn’t much of a change in structure despite the song losing a lot of impact due to the removal of percussion -- however, the main point that I’d like to bring up is the vocal accents here: you accent vocals two different ways, with 1:54.810 simply adding some color but not changing the layering, but every subsequent time doing a double accent, where you add both color and layering; the very first instance is technically the most correct application, and it helps in not making such an extremely dense structure for what is a break within the music
- 2:12.577/etc: very good choice to create a back-and-forth patterning with the triples against the bass here, adds more recognition within an otherwise extremely dense structure
- 2:28.451: move this jump off [LU]; it’s got a slightly different tonal quality than the repeating vocals starting a 16th later
- 2:30.926 to 2:46.954: gahhhh, so this is the one section of the chart I’m not a fan of; you actually had a pretty unique accenting point in the earlier half of this phrase, but you lose it by returning to this generic stream for the rising synth, which is actually not even as prevalent as it was earlier
- 2:47.091: same as 2:28.451
- 2:57.722: similar circumstance between chopped vocal samples and a fuller sample
- as a whole, this chart is extremely heavily layered, but there are some well crafted pattern choices at points to give attention to the points of layering
- first drop plays quite well and has a good impact with the song
- second drop is not quite as good in my opinion by way of being a bit more generic in streaming
- file’s actually not bad as a whole; while the layering and structure isn’t to my tastes due to the heaviness and generally large number of implicit mini-jacks, it’s only 103 BPM 16ths, which certainly makes it more than passable
- clean some stuff up and I can definitely see this being a file that upper level players enjoy (and might also try to rate mod; it scales reasonably well)

So, first of all thanks for the notes as always !

Here are the things I didn't fix:
- 11.557: I'm ok with that given the short lenght of the sections; the alternative would be to layer the very first section with singles and I dont like it.
- 2:30.926 to 2:46.954: I'm sorry man, it's a shame that it's the section that you dislike most too. While I totally get your point, I simply could not find any layering or technique I liked to make this section not some kind of copy-paste from the one before. I feel like this 5-jumps js keeps the bass structure while still having Some buildup vibe to it (given that I had streams/js for all similar buildups in the file). I will gladly try out any suggestions you feel is better if you somehow have time for that, but otherwise I'm keeping this as it.

What I'd like checked:
- 1:53.062 to 2:02.383: I believe I understood your comment correctly, but just making sure.

See reply to TC_Halogen's notes

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2653 => 2643
AVG NPS changed: 14.05935 => 14.00636
Hand Bias changed: -3 => -7

Definitely more polished; good shit. I can see an audience for this.