CG901B (remixing ver.) :: FFR Batch Submission

bmah - CG901B (remixing ver.) - misato with Na+ [8 / 10]

Easy Files

PublicPurchasedEvents

Released

Blanket permission for naotyu- (alias: Na+).
This is a very old song from around 2008, and the original file was stepped in 2012. The file was never submitted to FFR, but I've revisited it again. There has been minor tweaking to create a file a bit more suited for 2020, but the overall structure remains nearly the same as it was 8 years ago.

- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "CG901B (remixing ver.) [bmah]" vs "CG901B (remixing ver.) (bmah)"

Simfile Folder Name

CG901B (remixing ver.) [bmah]

Note Count

1383

Chart Length

3:05

Average NPS

7.6635

Estimated Difficulty

53.95

First Note

0:04

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 3

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 5 4 - 2

Jumps

								x 383
							

Hands

								x 53
							

Quads

x 1

Color Jumps

x 3

Color Hands

x 1

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
9 - 18.00 nps 1 Second
15 - 15.00 nps 2 Seconds
25 - 12.50 nps 5 Seconds
50 - 10.00 nps 10 Seconds
95 - 9.50 nps 30 Seconds
265 - 8.83 nps 1 Minute
515 - 8.58 nps

Color Count

x 690 (49.89%)

x 434 (31.38%)

x 2 (0.14%)

x 214 (15.47%)

x 3 (0.22%)

x 1 (0.07%)

x 5 (0.36%)

x 33 (2.39%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.9s0.9s0.9s0.9s0.9s0.87s0.87s0.57s

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Title changed: CG901B => CG901B (remixing ver.)
----------

Tools: Convert Timestamp

CG901B 8
49.804 excellent representation of the slurring on voice
57.804 Oof, this is aggressive. At low rate it checks out but I'd at least move 58.249 to [12] just to ease the anchor on 3.
1.41.360 this section plays incredibly empty for an uptick in the music, even disregarding the progression into the next section. I strongly recommend layering in at least the claps to jumps
1.57.582 of the ways to represent chart progression, the minijacks in this section feel...interesting? The percussion that plays as 2 16ths here like this is not layered in places like 1.58.471, so why the switch from minijacks to nothing at all?
Imo it also masks better places that could use minijacks, like 2.00.693 or 2.03.804 to go with the voice, which is basically the foreground instrument at this point.

In a playthrough, though, I can kind of see how that while the minijacks don't necessarily go to anything in the music strictly speaking, they do fit the energy of the song - I'm letting it slide for that reason.

2.26.207, etc same issue with minijacks as earlier
ending transitions between instruments looked a bit strange on paper but played well so no complaints
certified Grammy for Bmah Banger
Pretty good file, the minijacks were sort of questionable musically to me, but it makes the chart flow quite well and gives the requisite intensity to that section, so while I would do it differently, I think it's perfectly accept-worthy.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Title changed: CG901B (remixing ver.) => CG901B
----------
Note Count changed: 1326 => 1383
AVG NPS changed: 7.34762 => 7.66347
Hand Bias changed: -6 => 3

Tools: Convert Timestamp

Made significant changes to 1:41 and 1:57 area of the song where the layering is not so empty, but also easier to follow. There are definitely more arrows as a result, but the layering is easier to understand. However, the area at 2.26 remains the same - it presents some variety but it may represent better progression overall if only done in that section.

0:57 I didn't follow your advice but did something else: the two-arrow minijack here and in one area preceding this I changed to 16ths with no jacks.

Tools: Convert Timestamp