Cross†Over (feat. LyuU) :: FFR Batch Submission
Lights - Cross†Over (feat. LyuU) - HyuN [7.5 / 10]
Drumhead Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Change Recommended
v9 Hyun blanket
idk, its a file. it has notes in it. theres no story behind it. here ya go.

❌ File has received no updates or has not acknowledged the judges notes in a month.

- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Cross†Over feat. LyuU (Lights)" vs "Cross†Over (feat. LyuU) (Lights)"

Simfile Folder Name

Cross†Over feat. LyuU (Lights)

Note Count

1057

Chart Length

2:28

Average NPS

7.3149

Estimated Difficulty

54.82

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -1

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 16

Jumps

x 329

Hands

x 0

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
8 - 16.00 nps 1 Second
15 - 15.00 nps 2 Seconds
28 - 14.00 nps 5 Seconds
54 - 10.80 nps 10 Seconds
102 - 10.20 nps 30 Seconds
272 - 9.07 nps 1 Minute
536 - 8.93 nps

Color Count

x 585 (55.35%)
x 246 (23.27%)
x 12 (1.14%)
x 76 (7.19%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 138 (13.06%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.93s1.93s1.5s1.2s1.2s0.9s0.9s0.9s
35
28
21
14
7

I think I recall the † character causing issues in game. Will probably need to be changed to a +

Debatable whether the featured artist should go in the artist field. I would say it should but there's no real consensus.

Cross†Over feat. LyuU (Lights) [7.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.

01:05.917 - I get its probably for difficulty reasons, but it is noticeable that you dont layer in the 16ths here like you do at 00:57.067

01:07.867-01:24.667 - this section is kinda... boring. Its pretty high intensity but theres just nothing going on in the chart. 4th jumps with the occasional 8th, not even jacked. Honestly i feel like even just adding in a constant 8th stream could go a long way to make the section a bit more interesting. you do something pretty similar with 02:05.467 so there is reason to do it here too.

01:27.067 - i feel like this sound is too in your face to really sort of ignore it. the patterning blends into the background while the sound does not. I feel like something like a short trill here could go a long way. I understand it would be a jump in difficulty, but i feel like the sound justifies it enough.

01:38.467 - I feel like this snare is soft enough that it should be made a single note, compared to the more intensive kicks in this section.

01:39.667-01:41.167 i'm calling you out for your jump patterning. we have [13][34][13][34][34][14] which ignoring the anchor on 3 is a bit specific to be mainly using 2 jumps? Most obvious is the back to back [34] which annoyingly doesn't even have the same sound. (kick vs snare) so maybe make this section a bit more varied? or at least

01:38.767-01:43.867 I REALLY dont think the patterning/layering of this section is working for you. You seem to mainly be focusing on the percussion here, but the layering doesn't follow. We get jumps every 4th but they dont represent anything. every other 4th is a snare, which is good, but the kicks just dont make sense when they're every 8th. I feel like maybe some sort of jack motif here could make sense to represent the more intense nature of the section. Personally i would do something like 3 note jacks between the snare notes.

I really enjoy this chart. Outside the noted areas I do find the chart does a fantastic job at representing the song and proving a good fun challenge.

Judge Score: 7.50 - Change Recommended

Checking in on the status of this submission, as it's past the 1 month probationary period with a "Change Recommended" flag, but there's been no acknowledgment of judge notes or fixes submitted.

Files/Songs with the "Change Recommended" tag require at a minimum a response from the Stepauthor in order to continue through the submission system.

I will check back on this at a later date. If it does not receive a response or fix by then, it could risk rejection.

I have an arrangement with storn (on this file and my other drumhead batch file) to make a few non-trivial changes, might take a bit of time. his feedback has been acknowledged, though. please keep them on hold for a little bit- they havent been forgotten about.