Dan Dan Hayaku Naru :: FFR Batch Submission
nobody_serenity - Dan Dan Hayaku Naru - 40mP [7.5 / 10]
OT18 Bounty Batch - Courtroom
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
40mP blanket already in v9 sheet
either one of the two remaining 40-level bounties (low 40 or mid-high 40).

this file undoubtedly has issues, but i decided to send it first to see if it's a decent enough fit to warrant additional effort. please be patient.

✔️ The stepauthor has acknowledged the judges notes.

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

Simfile Folder Name

Dan Dan Hayaku Naru (nobody_serenity)

Note Count

934

Chart Length

2:18

Average NPS

6.958

Estimated Difficulty

43.08

First Note

0:04

Ending Note Delay

0:02

Hand Bias

No Bias

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 1

Jumps

x 254

Hands

x 6

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
9 - 18.00 nps 1 Second
15 - 15.00 nps 2 Seconds
24 - 12.00 nps 5 Seconds
51 - 10.20 nps 10 Seconds
92 - 9.20 nps 30 Seconds
252 - 8.40 nps 1 Minute
435 - 7.25 nps

Color Count

x 468 (50.11%)
x 338 (36.19%)
x 1 (0.11%)
x 125 (13.38%)
x 1 (0.11%)
x 1 (0.11%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

2.73s2s0.6s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.47s
35
28
21
14
7

Approved for low-40s bounty

Dan Dan Hayaku Naru (nobody_serenity)
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents good
>Sync good

-Experimental judge note format using labels.
-Open the .sm in a text editor and paste the below stuff in after the #STOPS:; line for best results. Don’t forget to save!
-Use the new AV version from the thread in #simfiles. Go to Tempo > Labels for a judge note list
-Notes are reproduced in normal format in the next comment if it's weird or doesn't work.

Will also preface my judge notes by clarifying that the *** notes are -not- required fixes. Rather, they are somewhat subjective, asking to remove notes based on a strict interpretation of the lyrics. (Referencing this Romaji) I don’t know anything about Japanese. The affected notes are broadly okay to include structurally, or change them for a closer feel to the lyrics. You can decide how “accurate” you want to be here. A lot of these are on the second “dandan” of a phrase so they are logical to include for variety, or remove for technicality.

#LABELS:0.000=See batch page about *** notes,
24.750=*** Remove,
32.750=*** Remove,
44.000=arguably not jump,
50.000=bonus points if this jump and...,
51.000=...this jump are the same,
68.750=*** Remove,
82.500=missing drum note - unless only following brass then ignore this,
88.750=*** Remove,
96.750=*** Remove,
104.750=*** Remove,
112.750=*** Remove,
119.500=jump PR might work well here - these jumps can be the same,
120.500=.,
121.500=.,
127.500=same potential jump PR idea,
128.750=missing drum note,
148.750=*** Remove,
152.750=*** Remove,
161.000=jump,
162.500=missing drum note - unless only following brass then ignore this,
168.750=*** Remove,
176.750=*** Remove,
184.750=*** Remove,
192.750=*** Remove,
208.750=*** Remove,
216.750=*** Remove,
224.750=*** Remove,
232.750=*** Remove,
244.000=not jump,
272.750=*** Remove,
280.750=*** Remove,
288.000=Needs a bunch of little touch up work,
288.250=This is a fantastic file in the works though!,
288.500=Very fun, intuitive structure, great song choice. ,
288.750=Perfect OT chart for this level. Nicely done!!
;

Will also preface my judge notes by clarifying that the *** notes are -not- required fixes. Rather, they are somewhat subjective, asking to remove notes based on a strict interpretation of the lyrics. (Referencing this Romaji) I don’t know anything about Japanese. The affected notes are broadly okay to include structurally, or change them for a closer feel to the lyrics. You can decide how “accurate” you want to be here. A lot of these are on the second “dandan” of a phrase so they are logical to include for variety, or remove for technicality.

00:13.268 - *** Remove
00:17.381 - *** Remove
00:22.789 - arguably not jump
00:25.646, 00:26.123 - bonus points if these are the same jump
00:34.575 - *** Remove
00:41.123 - missing drum note - unless only following brass then ignore this
00:44.093 - *** Remove
00:47.804 - *** Remove
00:51.403 - *** Remove
00:54.897 - *** Remove
00:57.769 / 00:58.192 / 00:58.614 - jump PR might work well here - these jumps can be the same
01:01.149 - same idea as last judge note can apply again here
01:01.677 - missing drum note
01:10.128 - *** Remove
01:11.818 - *** Remove
01:15.304 - jump
01:15.938 - missing drum note - unless only following brass then ignore this
01:18.683 - *** Remove
01:22.499 - *** Remove
01:26.719 - *** Remove
01:31.438 - *** Remove
01:40.330 - *** Remove
01:43.894 - *** Remove
01:47.257 - *** Remove
01:50.442 - *** Remove
01:54.692 - not jump
02:06.377 - *** Remove
02:10.751 - *** Remove

Needs a bunch of little touch up work. This is a fantastic file in the works though! Very fun, intuitive structure, great song choice, perfect OT chart for this level.

Judge Score: 7.50 - Change Recommended

Thank you for the compliments! Here are some thoughts I've had while updating the file. I'll upload the new version soon after I post this

00:13.268 - As a fellow Japanese not-knower, I opted to include these because of how the syllables are pronounced. On the first half of the verse, Miku spells it "dan-dan ha-ya-ku na-ru"; in the second, she does a kind of "da-n-da(n) i-so-ga-sh-ku na-ru" (the n is almost silent). I won't really be removing these as I think it reflects the different pronounciations through the notes, but yours is a fair interpretation.
00:34.575 - Echoing the 13.268 note, I charted the 16th here because of how Miku pronounces the word "my" here. If taken literally as the English word, it's very firmly monosyllabical, but in Japanese in general I can't shake off recognizing a distinct "i" (as in ma-i) in the end, and in this song I actually think it's fairly exaggerated compared to normal. However, I *will* be applying this one for two reasons: 1) on a second pass, it feels a bit too subtle and doesn't land as cleanly on the 16ths to justify that rhythm and 2) it actually creates nice variation entering that measure and cleans up a part of the file I felt looke d a bit ugly.
00:41.123 - I wasn't following the drums very strictly and wanted to emphasize the pause in the brass but on second thought it feels good so I rearranged a few notes before it and applied the note
00:57.769 - Don't think I can really do that - making these jumps the exact same would probably interfere a lot with the intention of making this a light jack section; I'd either have to go jumpstream or jump chain. What I *can* do is change one of the previous jumps and all the noted jumps so that all the ones before are 'open' jumps ([13], [24], [14]) and all the ones sharing a sound are 'closed' jumps ([12], [23], [34]) and shifting the structure around them; which also lets me make the 00:58.825 jack sequence a 3344 instead of 2211 again, evening out the hand bias of that pattern's repeated occurrences in the file.
01:01.677 - Funny enough I remembered this drum note about one bazillion times while making the map and always forgot it shortly after LOL. Also ended up layering the following crash
01:31.438 - Echoing the 13.268 note, I guess it's a little more subtle in the slowjam, but I'll be keeping it for consistency

While I believe that was everything, if I neglected something, it's because I applied the feedback without commentary.

applied notes by tru

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 935 => 932
AVG NPS changed: 6.96548 => 6.94313
Hand Bias changed: -3 => 4

actually no nevermind why is the first jump a [34] instead of [12]

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Hand Bias changed: 4 => 0

In any case, thank you for your time!

made 01:58.817 and 02:01.817 a jump because previously only 02:00.317 had a jump and it started feeling really weird this is the last change to this file i promise

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 932 => 934
AVG NPS changed: 6.94313 => 6.95803