Melody Circus - 2 :: FFR Batch Submission
Velocity -
Melody Circus - 2 -
Savant [6 / 10]
OT18 Bounty Batch - Courtroom
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Melody Circus (Velocity)" vs "Melody Circus - 2 (Velocity)"
Simfile Folder Name
Melody Circus (Velocity)
Note Count
871
Chart Length
2:26
Average NPS
6.0472
Estimated Difficulty
42.65
First Note
0:02
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 3
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
6 - 18.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
8 - 16.00 nps
1 Second
14 - 14.00 nps
2 Seconds
21 - 10.50 nps
5 Seconds
45 - 9.00 nps
10 Seconds
83 - 8.30 nps
30 Seconds
214 - 7.13 nps
1 Minute
390 - 6.50 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
1.3s1.3s0.87s0.87s0.87s0.57s0.57s0.57s
Posted at 10:22am on March 16th, 2025
Approved for low 40s bounty
Posted at 3:47pm on May 21st, 2025
Melody Circus (Velocity)
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents good
>Sync good
>idk what that 2 in the song name is about
-Experimental judge note format using labels.
-Open the .sm in a text editor and paste this in after the #STOPS:; line for best results. Use the new AV version from judge chat.
-Notes are reproduced in normal format in next comment if it's weird or doesn't work.
#LABELS:48.667=missing,
125.000=kind of want a flam for this,
139.000=kind of want a flam for this,
142.000=20ths are a good choice here,
151.000=...it's close enough but charting this accurately would be easier if slightly harder to read,
151.167=really just move this note down to the 16th,
151.250=.,
151.750=will also want this note,
154.000=may as well keep following the ..piccolo? here,
158.000=and here,
202.333=ghost?,
203.667=ghost?,
205.500=missing? Might be intentional idk,
209.500=can get away with adding this note,
237.667=missing,
241.667=missing,
256.000=should probably be a hand based on upcoming hand use,
282.667=missing?,
283.667=ghost?,
285.500=same possibly missing as 1:28.102,
337.000=Chart is a bit messy and misses a lot of opportunities for more interesting approaches.,
337.250=Especially with following the piccolo thing - there can be a lot more flams to make this interesting
337.500=Whether they were ignored for difficulty is debatable. But the chart seems to suffer a bit from repetition
;
Judge Score: 6.00 - Rejected
Posted at 3:48pm on May 21st, 2025
00:20.888 - missing,
00:53.602 - kind of want a flam for this,
00:59.602 - kind of want a flam for this,
01:00.888 - 20ths are a good choice here,
01:04.745 - ..it's close enough but charting this accurately would be easier if slightly harder to read,really just move .816 down to the 16th,
01:05.066 - will also want this note,
01:06.031 - may as well keep following the ..piccolo? here,
01:07.745 - and here,
01:26.745 - ghost?,
01:27.316 - ghost?,
01:28.102 - missing? Might be intentional idk,
01:29.816 - can get away with adding this note,
01:41.888 - missing,
01:43.602 - missing,
01:49.745 - should probably be a hand based on upcoming hand use,
02:01.173 - missing?,
02:01.602 - ghost?,
02:02.388 - same possibly missing as 1:28.102,
Chart is a bit messy and misses a lot of opportunities for more interesting approaches. Especially with following the piccolo thing - there can be a lot more flams to make this interesting. Whether they were ignored for difficulty is debatable. But the chart seems to suffer a bit from repetition and there is some detail that could be added to help that perception.
Posted at 10:45pm on May 21st, 2025
> idk what that 2 in the song name is about
The song was a remake of a previous song with the same name but released in the Alchemist 2 album. It's sometimes referred to with a "- 2" by the author in some places.
I did sacrifice a few things to meet the difficult I wanted to reach, but missed the mark on the quality.
Thanks for the notes.