35
28
21
14
7
Prodigy :: FFR Batch Submission
storn42 -
Prodigy -
Eidola [8 / 10]
OT18 Bounty Batch - Courtroom
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Accepted
From the album Mend Released under Rise Records
Hoping the chorus isn't *too* spiky. otherwise i'm pleasantly surprised with how this file came out.
✔️ The stepauthor has acknowledged the judges notes.
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
Simfile Folder Name
Prodigy (Storn42)Note Count
1414Chart Length
3:46Average NPS
6.3351Estimated Difficulty
55.03
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
No BiasFramers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 116Jumps
x 175
Hands
x 4
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 3
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second6 - 18.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
7 - 14.00 nps 1 Second
12 - 12.00 nps 2 Seconds
20 - 10.00 nps 5 Seconds
45 - 9.00 nps 10 Seconds
87 - 8.70 nps 30 Seconds
247 - 8.23 nps 1 Minute
411 - 6.85 nps
Color Count
x 549 (38.83%)
x 284 (20.08%)
x 23 (1.63%)
x 492 (34.79%)
x 6 (0.42%)
x 21 (1.49%)
x 33 (2.33%)
x 2 (0.14%)
x 4 (0.28%)
Posted at 10:00am on January 19th, 2025
I have some reservations about this one due to the length
But this tends to be a tricky difficulty range to fill, and this has a decent amount of pattern variety
Approved for low-mid 50s bounty
Posted at 11:42pm on July 29th, 2025
Prodigy
~~
4.535, 8.881: I don't believe these are technically minijacks PR-wise.
13.507: 16th feels conspicuously absent after those interesting triplets just before this.
14.208: Jump?
33.553: Missing note.
35.096, 97.899: Contrary to 4.535, I see what you're doing here, but I might actually prefer a column 1 minijack. Helps distinguish it from the flam (rolling leftward -> minijack vs. rolling leftward -> rolling leftward but slower).
47.082: While this is quieter than 109.885, if you follow that, I feel it'd work better to follow this as well.
51.915, 114.722, etc: No minitrill? :(
78.974: Lower than previous minijack, suggest column 2.
* 136.311, 145.282: If you follow this 32nd burst to vocals, it makes no sense not to also follow the clipped vocals at 136.591 and 136.731. (Note: clipped vocals not present at 141.077.)
165.049: (subjective) While consistent, this jump seems noticeably softer than the other instances of the sound. If you tactically reduced 124.114 to a single, I could see the same happening here too.
171.638: No 32nds? :(
173.039: Missing note.
197.292: Perhaps 1243 to distinguish from previous 48th burst?
* 221.544-222.245: Watch column 4 here, this is tougher than your patterning around other bursts & also literally right at the end of the file.
This is a nice file. Fairly long, but mixes things up enough not to overstay its welcome. Acceptable as-is, though I would like to see the *'d notes fixed for sure, and minijack use could be tightened up in some places. [8/10]
Judge Score: 8.00 - Accepted
Posted at 12:27pm on July 30th, 2025
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1406 => 1414
AVG NPS changed: 6.29928 => 6.33513
Hand Bias changed: 8 => 0
Posted at 12:28pm on July 30th, 2025
4.535, 8.881: I don't believe these are technically minijacks PR-wise.
- fixed
13.507: 16th feels conspicuously absent after those interesting triplets just before this.
- I really didn't hear this before. Considering its only 1 instrument with the note here, and its soft I feel like my intuition to ignore it is the right one.
14.208: Jump?
- fixed
33.553: Missing note.
- Its a bit of a soft bass note. I dont really see a reason for me to chart it.
35.096, 97.899: Contrary to 4.535, I see what you're doing here, but I might actually prefer a column 1 minijack. Helps distinguish it from the flam (rolling leftward -> minijack vs. rolling leftward -> rolling leftward but slower).
- i've mixed up the minijack pattern a bit.
47.082: While this is quieter than 109.885, if you follow that, I feel it'd work better to follow this as well.
- fixed
51.915, 114.722, etc: No minitrill? :(
- i could, but i felt the pattern was already pretty rude with the b2b bursts.
78.974: Lower than previous minijack, suggest column 2.
- nope These have to stay in the same column. The entire jack scheme in this map is that every syllable in a word gets jacked. annihilate has 4 syllables, so we get a 4 note jack.
* 136.311, 145.282: If you follow this 32nd burst to vocals, it makes no sense not to also follow the clipped vocals at 136.591 and 136.731. (Note: clipped vocals not present at 141.077.)
- I really disagree with this. Either i'm misunderstanding what you are saying and dont hear what you're talking about, meaning i shouldn't chart it, or You're talking about the ending t of the word, which I also disagree with charting. The sharp change in pitch is different from the ending of the word, and if i were to chart it i would also have to chart things like 02:34.815 which doesn't really make sense.
165.049: (subjective) While consistent, this jump seems noticeably softer than the other instances of the sound. If you tactically reduced 124.114 to a single, I could see the same happening here too.
- I hear it, but i dont think its soft enough to ignore for consistency. fixed 124.114 since that should've been a jump.
171.638: No 32nds? :(
- tbh, i never heard those 32nds. I can add the first 2 bursts, but it feels like all the other ones are too soft and sound like ghosts notes.
173.039: Missing note.
- Thats just an echo. If i charted every echo note in this section, things would get VERY messy.
197.292: Perhaps 1243 to distinguish from previous 48th burst?
- sure
* 221.544-222.245: Watch column 4 here, this is tougher than your patterning around other bursts & also literally right at the end of the file.
- I've changed the patterning up a little to be a bit more friendly. Still dont