TEN
~~

* The two sections from 57.515-82.867 and 143.712-148.782 feel way harder than the rest of the file to me, both mirrored and non-mirrored, which is saying something because both of those sections are pretty right-hand biased. The jacks are substantially longer than those elsewhere in the file, and within those longjacks the patterning can be pretty aggressive, so the control requirement isn't any lower either. Seeing as these sections make up a decent portion of the file & the difficulty is relatively homogeneous within them, I don't think an FR would be reasonable, but I would be remiss not to mention the difficulty imbalance. If you want clarification or suggestions for nerfs, DM me!!

49.064: Given how different this sound is from the surrounding quads, I'd advise accenting it differently. Perhaps use hands here & 48.853 to accent the kicks? (The only other place this would affect is 42.092, which I'm fine with because the quad use much more clearly denotes the increase in intensity.)
53.712: Should be quad.
57.198, 63.958: Not a repeated high-pitched chiptune note like the jack fiesta on column 4 afterwards, strongly suggest moving to a different column. Left hand preferred.
58.888, 65.649: This fits your two-track layering scheme, but given that the melody is particularly loud & climactic on the previous jump and particularly quiet here, I feel this would make more sense as a single.
65.649: Suggest moving minijack on column 1 to distinguish from previous 4-note jacks.
72.620: Why 3-note jack?
73.254-74.733: There are a lot of column 4 ouchies in this section, but this one doesn't seem as intentional as most others.
81.388: Why 4-note jack?
154.804: Missing jump.
190.085: This 3-note jack isn't PR-accurate or forced by patterning, suggest moving (especially because of collision with previous minijack).
204.557: Quad feels overkill here, but it's funny, so sure lol.

This file is objectively well constructed, but man, it's mean sometimes. PRing jacks for the two instruments independently in the 57.515-82.867 section is wild but fair. I definitely think this chart would have a wider audience & more replayability if the difficulty curve were smoothed somewhat, but I also think it's acceptable as-is. [7.5/10 CR]

Judge Score: 7.50 - Change Recommended