Robinet :: FFR Batch Submission
Lights -
Robinet -
Ruby My Dear [7.5 / 10]
OT17 Bounty Batch
PublicEvents
Released
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Robinet (Lights & Deamerai)" vs "Robinet (Lights)"
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
- This file is a collaboration between multiple authors / stepauthors.
Simfile Folder Name
Robinet (Lights & Deamerai)
Note Count
2984
Chart Length
3:16
Average NPS
15.6942
Estimated Difficulty
98.43
First Note
0:06
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
No Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 35
3 - 77
4 - 739
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps
1 Second
27 - 27.00 nps
2 Seconds
49 - 24.50 nps
5 Seconds
114 - 22.80 nps
10 Seconds
201 - 20.10 nps
30 Seconds
524 - 17.47 nps
1 Minute
1008 - 16.80 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
0.7s0.67s0.67s0.4s0.4s0.4s0.4s0.4s
Posted at 10:11pm on April 2nd, 2024
Approved for high-90s/low-100s bounty. Cleared for judgement.
Posted at 8:25pm on April 10th, 2024
Robinet (Lights & Deamerai) [7.5/10] -FR-
PERMS OK
SYNC OK
3.410: PR with 3.956 & 4.365 would indicate a (12) there or at least not a (34).
5.592: Consider (14).
8.490: Odd representation here given that the burst sound clearly starts on the 16th, doesn't flow too well. Same for similar iterations.
13.638: PR, a (124) here just like the others. 13.092 is fine given the added melody sound.
24.547: Would suggest (14)2 here to really break from the descending 32nds since the drums change at 24.410.
28.365-29.047: Weird PR there.
51.069: Why is this not a minijack with the 16th? Also if changed watch out for the transition into the 48ths burst as just moving this 32nd to col 3 would be ugly.
1:00.001-1:04.501: Watch out for the hand bias here, there's so much long right hand trilling compared to left hand, and it's not really justified.
1:05.081: This is random; the double voices hit slightly stronger I guess.
1:30.410: There's no jumps layering for the melody at 1:23.865 for example. Should probably be a single note here.
1:56.638: Pretty rough patterning here; the forced minijacks dont really fit anything except for the one at 1:56.683. Highly suggest this from the 8th (34): (34)14231423(14).
2:00.819-2:01.228: This plays pretty awkward on the left and is very unintuitive PR.
2:07.615-2:08.251 [FR]: Again this is nasty on the left hand and a significant spike.
2:36.956-2:38.592 [FR]: Layering here is fine, but the patterning makes it too spiky this late in the chart. Tone it down with either a bit more one handed jumps or a more intuitive pattern as this is quite random.
2:55.501: Lol. Sure I guess.
This is fine. Decent variety with fun abstractions and rhythms, and a pretty good difficulty curve. Fix the overly spiky bits and this should make for an enjoyable tech challenge. A PR cleanup wouldn't hurt either.
Judge Score: 7.50 - Fixes Required
Posted at 3:47pm on May 26th, 2024
Robinet (Lights & Deamerai) [7.5/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good
Basically my notes are amounting to somewhat subjective burst suggestions. The chart is fine as is, but I think taking a few liberties with strict burst accuracy to better reflect the song’s intensity would work better.
8.456 , 17.183 - kind of want a note here. Also suggest 48ths
9.001, 10.638 - suggest 64ths
12.547 - suggest 48ths
20.047 - suggest 48ths, would be consistent with 18.138 / .410
44.728 - suggest 64ths
53.456 - suggest 64ths
1:05.047 - why flam?
1:09.410 - suggest minijack not on 4 for PR. 1 might be cool
1:11.592 - minijack back to 4 for PR
1:13.228 - 1:21.956 - (subjective) I’m guessing you’re deliberately ignoring the sax/brass minijack motif you’d set up in the previous section. Might be cool to keep it going
1:20.865 - hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa idk about this. Probably ok
1:42.956 - (subjective) transition to some more trilly patterns or something to better highlight the fill might be cool
1:56.319 - suggest 48ths to .456, 64ths to .592. Patterns might be tricky to work out
Chart’s cool. No major complaints, mostly just subjective stuff. Good to go as-is or with some touch ups.
Judge Score: 7.50 - Accepted
Posted at 8:10pm on June 4th, 2024
I had a bunch of formatted replies to the notes but they got jumbled up going back and forth with deam. we addressed most of the notes.
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2988 => 2984
AVG NPS changed: 15.71529 => 15.69425
Hand Bias changed: 4 => 0
Posted at 4:25am on June 5th, 2024
Fixes be good