Robinet :: FFR Batch Submission
Lights - Robinet - Ruby My Dear [7.5 / 10]
OT17 Bounty Batch
PublicEvents
Released
v9 speadsheet Ruby my Dear
Upper 90s bounty

Collab with Deamerai

idfk what to type for this. its a file, its pretty hard. Wafflebutt

- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Robinet (Lights & Deamerai)" vs "Robinet (Lights)"

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

- This file is a collaboration between multiple authors / stepauthors.

Simfile Folder Name

Robinet (Lights & Deamerai)

Note Count

2984

Chart Length

3:16

Average NPS

15.6942

Estimated Difficulty

98.43

First Note

0:06

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

No Bias

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 35 3 - 77 4 - 739

Jumps

x 517

Hands

x 129

Quads

x 6

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps 1 Second
27 - 27.00 nps 2 Seconds
49 - 24.50 nps 5 Seconds
114 - 22.80 nps 10 Seconds
201 - 20.10 nps 30 Seconds
524 - 17.47 nps 1 Minute
1008 - 16.80 nps

Color Count

x 590 (19.77%)
x 516 (17.29%)
x 60 (2.01%)
x 820 (27.48%)
x 59 (1.98%)
x 465 (15.58%)
x 78 (2.61%)
x 106 (3.55%)
x 290 (9.72%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.7s0.67s0.67s0.4s0.4s0.4s0.4s0.4s
35
28
21
14
7

Approved for high-90s/low-100s bounty. Cleared for judgement.

Robinet (Lights & Deamerai) [7.5/10] -FR-

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

3.410: PR with 3.956 & 4.365 would indicate a (12) there or at least not a (34).

5.592: Consider (14).

8.490: Odd representation here given that the burst sound clearly starts on the 16th, doesn't flow too well. Same for similar iterations.

13.638: PR, a (124) here just like the others. 13.092 is fine given the added melody sound.

24.547: Would suggest (14)2 here to really break from the descending 32nds since the drums change at 24.410.

28.365-29.047: Weird PR there.

51.069: Why is this not a minijack with the 16th? Also if changed watch out for the transition into the 48ths burst as just moving this 32nd to col 3 would be ugly.

1:00.001-1:04.501: Watch out for the hand bias here, there's so much long right hand trilling compared to left hand, and it's not really justified.

1:05.081: This is random; the double voices hit slightly stronger I guess.

1:30.410: There's no jumps layering for the melody at 1:23.865 for example. Should probably be a single note here.

1:56.638: Pretty rough patterning here; the forced minijacks dont really fit anything except for the one at 1:56.683. Highly suggest this from the 8th (34): (34)14231423(14).

2:00.819-2:01.228: This plays pretty awkward on the left and is very unintuitive PR.

2:07.615-2:08.251 [FR]: Again this is nasty on the left hand and a significant spike.

2:36.956-2:38.592 [FR]: Layering here is fine, but the patterning makes it too spiky this late in the chart. Tone it down with either a bit more one handed jumps or a more intuitive pattern as this is quite random.

2:55.501: Lol. Sure I guess.

This is fine. Decent variety with fun abstractions and rhythms, and a pretty good difficulty curve. Fix the overly spiky bits and this should make for an enjoyable tech challenge. A PR cleanup wouldn't hurt either.

Judge Score: 7.50 - Fixes Required

Robinet (Lights & Deamerai) [7.5/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good

Basically my notes are amounting to somewhat subjective burst suggestions. The chart is fine as is, but I think taking a few liberties with strict burst accuracy to better reflect the song’s intensity would work better.

8.456 , 17.183 - kind of want a note here. Also suggest 48ths
9.001, 10.638 - suggest 64ths
12.547 - suggest 48ths
20.047 - suggest 48ths, would be consistent with 18.138 / .410
44.728 - suggest 64ths
53.456 - suggest 64ths
1:05.047 - why flam?
1:09.410 - suggest minijack not on 4 for PR. 1 might be cool
1:11.592 - minijack back to 4 for PR
1:13.228 - 1:21.956 - (subjective) I’m guessing you’re deliberately ignoring the sax/brass minijack motif you’d set up in the previous section. Might be cool to keep it going
1:20.865 - hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa idk about this. Probably ok
1:42.956 - (subjective) transition to some more trilly patterns or something to better highlight the fill might be cool
1:56.319 - suggest 48ths to .456, 64ths to .592. Patterns might be tricky to work out

Chart’s cool. No major complaints, mostly just subjective stuff. Good to go as-is or with some touch ups.

Judge Score: 7.50 - Accepted

I had a bunch of formatted replies to the notes but they got jumbled up going back and forth with deam. we addressed most of the notes.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2988 => 2984
AVG NPS changed: 15.71529 => 15.69425
Hand Bias changed: 4 => 0

Fixes be good