35
28
21
14
7
One Hour Hero :: FFR Batch Submission
Lambdadelta -
One Hour Hero -
Reizoko CJ [5.75 / 10]
Winter 2023 Seasonal Batch
Token
Rejected
reizoko cj
Full combo Autoprocess with exactly 3 goods, 6 averages, 0 misses, and 0 boos to unlock One Hour Hero
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "One Hour Hero - (Lambdadelta)" vs "One Hour Hero (Lambdadelta)"
Simfile Folder Name
One Hour Hero - (Lambdadelta)Note Count
926Chart Length
0:58Average NPS
16.7048Estimated Difficulty
95.07
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 8
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 1 2 - 2 3 - 150 4 - 181Jumps
x 241
Hands
x 19
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 6
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second11 - 33.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
16 - 32.00 nps 1 Second
26 - 26.00 nps 2 Seconds
47 - 23.50 nps 5 Seconds
113 - 22.60 nps 10 Seconds
214 - 21.40 nps 30 Seconds
598 - 19.93 nps 1 Minute
0 - 0.00 nps
Color Count
x 384 (41.47%)
x 308 (33.26%)
x 11 (1.19%)
x 179 (19.33%)
x 12 (1.3%)
x 31 (3.35%)
x 1 (0.11%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 1:45am on December 5th, 2023
Submitted the wrong .sm, this one has the fixed offset.
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Offset changed: -0.283991 => -0.167
----------
Posted at 10:23pm on April 3rd, 2024
One Hour Hero (Lambdadelta) [6/10]
- Perms, metadata, sync are good
7.108 - Not 16th?
15.225-16.872 - Why not single notes here? This part is relatively tame
17.107-18.049 - 24ths is too vague for what's happening there. There can be a better structure to the stretched amen break noise
25.578-33.107 - The layering here is overly dense, anchory & not correct with the song. You have many 16ths here that are ghosted
38.754-40.048 - Lots of ghosted notes too
41.342-44.401 - ^
Generally the layering & structure makes sense, but the difficutly consistency is all over the place and feels overly additive (& as a result dense) for the length of it. Some of the jump usage needs to be trimmed down to maintain better balance to the file. As it is I don't find this enjoyable to play and I believe many others will feel the same about that as well.
Posted at 10:28pm on April 3rd, 2024
One Hour Hero (Lambdadelta) [5.5/10]
PERMS OK
SYNC NOT OK (Off by about one 96th or 10ms)
4.990: The left hand bias on these 3 minijacks is rough.
6.284-7.127: Sync is off. The long 8ths jack should be on the much more prominent sound that is delayed by a full 24th for example.
6.931: Missing note.
8.225 & 8.343: These are extremely subtle relative to the 16ths right after. Maybe better off omitting them. The latter could be kept if you want given the slightly more audible drum note.
9.990 & 10.225 & 10.460 & 10.696: Also all very subtle and not really intuitive at full speed.
11.519: Continuing the right hand trill here feels odd since the jumptrill going to the kick ends on 11.460.
11.872 & 12.107: See given the previous statements, these would have to be layered if the previous ones mentioned are to be kept. Bit inconsistent. That being said, the best move is probably to omit them all.
12.519: PR, why is this not the same jump as the preceeding 4th? The jump at 12.990 would also have to match them.
13.402: Again not really audible or intuitive.
13.578: Why not a jump? Kick + melody.
15.401 & 15.637 & etc: All these, too subtle.
17.107-18.049: Really awkward patterning there.
18.813: Just pointing out how incredibly clear these 16ths here are in comparison to everything mentioned before. The contrast really doesn't fit well.
21.931: Too subtle.
24.166: Single here, no kick.
24.872: Also a single.
25.637 & 25.695: Ghost notes. The latter could be arguable.
Stopping the notes here. The full chart was inspected, however the layering concern is too important and would essentially require a significant rework.
This chart has good consistency in terms of keeping the difficulty relatively high and balanced, which matches the song. However, it really does feel quite overdone and the representation takes a big hit because of it; many sections become a blur of 16ths that aren't intuitive. Given that this primary concern is spread througout the chart, the fixes required would be non-trivial and most likely change the chart a lot, hence the rating.