Visiting Mom :: FFR Batch Submission

Queue | Open Batches

Tru - Visiting Mom - Jake Kaufman [7 / 10]

Winter 2023 Seasonal Batch

PublicEvents

Released

CC BY-NC-SA https://virt.bandcamp.com/album/shovel-knight-king-of-cards-ost

An old file I've had kicking around for a bit and never submitted.

Ideally Mother's Day release.

✔️ The stepauthor has acknowledged the judges notes.

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

Simfile Folder Name

Visiting Mom (Tru)

Note Count

436

Chart Length

0:56

Average NPS

8.1091

Estimated Difficulty

43.78

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

No Bias

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 5

Jumps

								x 101
							

Hands

x 8

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
6 - 18.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
7 - 14.00 nps 1 Second
13 - 13.00 nps 2 Seconds
24 - 12.00 nps 5 Seconds
56 - 11.20 nps 10 Seconds
103 - 10.30 nps 30 Seconds
289 - 9.63 nps 1 Minute
0 - 0.00 nps

Color Count

x 135 (30.96%)

x 37 (8.49%)

x 168 (38.53%)

x 8 (1.83%)

x 68 (15.6%)

x 2 (0.46%)

x 12 (2.75%)

x 1 (0.23%)

x 5 (1.15%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.53s0.53s0.53s0.4s0.33s0.33s0.33s0.33s

Visiting Mom (Tru) [7/10]

- Perms, metadata, sync are good

- nice .sm name

4.105 - The kick bleep significantly overpowers the low-res bleep that you're representing with the anchor. I suggest you should break it to [34]

*10.705-11.305 - Noticable wrong quantization for the trills here. Fix it

14.905 - PR, technically col 1

20.771 - Very noticable missing note

21.571 - Also here. Compare with 19.971

32.371 - Probably better as [23]

48.105-50.504 - Could use some variation for the hands. The bleep pitch is slightly different for each section

*52.771 - Ghost note

Okay, sure. Review CR * notes and notes in general and it's good to go.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

Visiting Mom (Tru) [7/10]

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

19.838: This is maybe fine to put the emphasis on the 24th at 19.971, but then 21.438 & 21.571 have to be consistent with that. Fix for consistency (suggest just having all the notes).

30.505: The layering decisions are a little bit eh; not much to be done though but there is a clear intensity difference between 28.905 & 29.705 compared to 30.505, which makes the jumps feel slightly odd. No big deal though.

38.504-48.105: The two voices in this section get mixed up in a rather unintuitive way. For example, at 39.171 the low voice is clearly much louder and would be a minijack with the previous note. 47.438 would also be a minijack with the dominant voice. The jumps layering is also difficult to follow.

Chart is cute and fun. Last third would really benefit from a double check on what can be made clearer in terms of what the layering intent is, but overall there are fun rhythms and nothing egregious.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

Thanks for notes!~

A new chart file was uploaded.

Tools: Convert Timestamp