LE6!%N :: FFR Batch Submission
Lambdadelta - LE6!%N - Frums [8.5 / 10]
Winter 2023 Seasonal Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
Frums blanket
Uploaded on behalf of Lambdadelta.

- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Legion - (Lambdadelta)" vs "LE6!%N (Lambdadelta)"

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

Simfile Folder Name

Legion - (Lambdadelta)

Note Count

1551

Chart Length

2:00

Average NPS

14.273

Estimated Difficulty

91.97

First Note

0:11

Ending Note Delay

0:05

Hand Bias

x -23

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 1 3 - 24 4 - 424

Jumps

x 339

Hands

x 4

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 1

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
11 - 33.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps 1 Second
29 - 29.00 nps 2 Seconds
49 - 24.50 nps 5 Seconds
111 - 22.20 nps 10 Seconds
210 - 21.00 nps 30 Seconds
571 - 19.03 nps 1 Minute
1121 - 18.68 nps

Color Count

x 479 (30.88%)
x 431 (27.79%)
x 21 (1.35%)
x 581 (37.46%)
x 0 (0%)
x 34 (2.19%)
x 1 (0.06%)
x 1 (0.06%)
x 3 (0.19%)

Largest Note Gaps

4.17s2.5s2.37s1.2s0.43s0.43s0.43s0.43s
35
28
21
14
7

Legion / L6!%N (Lambdadelta) [8/10] [Fixes Required]

- Perms, metadata, sync are good

- *Intro has a lot of empty space. Suggest to cut it up to where the notes actually begin

**53.111-53.250 - This burst is spiky here. You can just do grey 16ths here to the dip sound

1:00.819 - PR, should be on 4

1:03.736 - Not a jump

1:03.875 - ^

1:04.014 - This one is a jump though

The anchored JS on the right at the end makes sense, but also feel like it can be a bit awkward to play, pretty subjective though, but just something I wanted to note.

Solid file. Structure is straightforward and the file is overall consistent with it's difficulty. Only thing to change is the FR note on ** and the other notes and it's good to go.

Legion (Lambdadelta) [9/10]

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

53.250: This is a bit rough. Changing it to a single on col 1 would alleviate this sudden transition to the fast part.

55.056: Here you could maybe afford doing (34)(34)(12)(34)(34) instead for better PR and added variety. It'd be a bit spiky but not that much. It would also contrast with the actual jumptrills like 1:06.722 where (34)(12)(34)(12)(34) is correct. Just an idea though.

58.979: Would suggest omitting this 32nd, and moving it to 58.910 for the bass-y roll sound. This would also allow for more flexibility with the patterning of the 32nds burst to increase representation. Technically, this note isn't a 32nd anyways it's a 48th at 58.991 so omitting it also feels more accurate with the longer gap.

Oh wow, that is a pretty interesting chart. Very few notable errors. The PR and motifs are very good and pleasant, everything feels pretty natural. The long intro drags a bit unfortunately but it was approached in a consistent manner with the layering buildup. Pretty impressed, good job.

I've addressed all concerns and made the necessary fixes required, everything should be good to go unless further fixes are required.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1557 => 1551
AVG NPS changed: 14.32822 => 14.27301
Hand Bias changed: -21 => -19

Me and Oppie have decided that the note suggested for 55.056 made this the most hard hitting pattern now and it doesn't play well in the file.

What I suggest to do with this part is to revert it back to jumptrills ([34][12][34][12][34]) and simply change the 8th jump to a single note (So it's now [34][12][4][12][34]). That way it also matches with notes 55.403 and 55.542 in terms of layering.

Once this is addressed, the file should definitely be good to go.

Would like to get this moved through the pipeline ASAP if/when file is good to go, so assigning myself to pings on this song here don't mind this post.

Reverted change made at 55.056 back to original [12][34] jump trill pattern

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Hand Bias changed: -19 => -21

Made a change to the burst pattern at 58.910 suggested by Oppie to make it a bit less awkward

The previous concern at 55.056 was not actually fixed with the last submission, I have now actually fixed it with the recent submission.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1551 => 1550
AVG NPS changed: 14.27301 => 14.2638
Hand Bias changed: -21 => -22

Good to go. Good stuff.

Was viewing my file submission after it had already been accepted and noticed a note missing that appeared to have been overlooked. At 46.792 there is a 16th note directly after a [23] jump, this 16th note is missing at the jump at 51.237. This error has been corrected, I could not allow the file to go through with being accepted without first fixing this.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1550 => 1551
AVG NPS changed: 14.2638 => 14.27301
Hand Bias changed: -22 => -23

Forgot to note that this this is the final version and there will be no additional updates from this point onward.