LOVERYTEKS :: FFR Batch Submission

Queue | Open Batches

Matthia - LOVERYTEKS - DJ Sharpnel [7.5 / 10]

Round-Table Special Batch

PublicEvents

Released

Line 402

semi-annual ffr submission

DJ Sharpnel blanket

Simfile Folder Name

LOVERYTEKS (Matthia)

Note Count

4720

Chart Length

5:13

Average NPS

15.1915

Estimated Difficulty

93.78

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -6

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 28 4 - 469

Jumps

								x 1072
							

Hands

								x 130
							

Quads

x 1

Color Jumps

x 5

Color Hands

x 1

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps 1 Second
26 - 26.00 nps 2 Seconds
47 - 23.50 nps 5 Seconds
104 - 20.80 nps 10 Seconds
203 - 20.30 nps 30 Seconds
573 - 19.10 nps 1 Minute
1106 - 18.43 nps

Color Count

x 1755 (37.18%)

x 1242 (26.31%)

x 113 (2.39%)

x 1168 (24.75%)

x 109 (2.31%)

x 41 (0.87%)

x 0 (0%)

x 292 (6.19%)

Largest Note Gaps

3.83s2.53s0.8s0.8s0.8s0.8s0.5s0.5s

Accept

Check layering at 3:30.093 - 3:38.846. Not entirely sure what's going on here.

Semi-annual "sure, I guess" judgement. This does a decent job of creating variety despite the length.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

LOVERYTEKS (Matthia) [FR]

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

This chart is quite nice and the JS/HS are carefully charted, the flow is quite nice. There isn't a lot to not but the couple things I've noticed are quite important:

1. The usage of the 32nds flams in the abstracted vocals. I'll take the rare liberty to say these simply don't work. It breaks the flow of the chart so much and the relatively smooth vocals don't justify that.

2. The sections at 20.705-39.803 and 3:08.767-3:30.093 are sooo empty. There's the odd 12ths thrown in here and there but they're super sparse. There should probably be a lot more going on to emphasize the vocals in these two sections even if that means adding polys because as is they're filler.

3. While not objectively wrong, it's a brave and/or slightly strange choice to have 16ths jumps as the abstraction for some of the vocals when just having shorter 24ths would've probably worked very well too. Not gonna fault for this but mentioning it so that you're aware and can make the call.

Overall really promising, but the main concerns are too important for a simple CR. Would have to fix points 1 and 2 (and check Tru's layering concern too) first.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

tfw Tru forgor to make a post about the flag like the other round-table batch posts.

>:(

1 Accept/1 Fixes Required
Moved to CR

Thanks for your submission!

Tools: Convert Timestamp

Checking in on the status of this submission, as it's past the 1 month probationary period with a "Change Recommended" flag, but there's been no acknowledgment of judge notes or fixes submitted.

Files/Songs with the "Change Recommended" tag require at a minimum a response from the Stepauthor in order to continue through the submission system.

I will check back on this at a later date. If it does not receive a response or fix by then, it could risk rejection.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

Apologies for the long silence, I will be finalizing the file as is.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

Alright cool. I'll push it forward this evening so that I don't forget.

Tools: Convert Timestamp