35
28
21
14
7
Parallel Skydive :: FFR Batch Submission
Zeta -
Parallel Skydive -
ああああ [8.25 / 10]
16th Official Tournament (see thread)
PublicEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4785011&postcount=403
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Parallel Skydive (Zeta64)" vs "Parallel Skydive (Zeta)"
Simfile Folder Name
Parallel Skydive (Zeta64)Note Count
1319Chart Length
1:53Average NPS
12.0898Estimated Difficulty
81.5
First Note
0:04Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -23
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 61 4 - 50Jumps
x 274
Hands
x 66
Quads
x 1
Color Jumps
x 2
Color Hands
x 1
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
21 - 21.00 nps 2 Seconds
37 - 18.50 nps 5 Seconds
84 - 16.80 nps 10 Seconds
159 - 15.90 nps 30 Seconds
417 - 13.90 nps 1 Minute
777 - 12.95 nps
Color Count
x 384 (29.11%)
x 322 (24.41%)
x 51 (3.87%)
x 486 (36.85%)
x 50 (3.79%)
x 3 (0.23%)
x 5 (0.38%)
x 1 (0.08%)
x 17 (1.29%)
Posted at 11:08pm on May 13th, 2023
Parallel Skydive
----------------
- Permission, sync, metadata good.
- 9.807: Would suggest a different jump than the previous here to mark the high piano. This pattern is a little homogeneous as is.
- 39.218: Fairly noticeable piano 32nd here, could be worth including.
- 42.486: This dual-layer PR is cool, but I do feel it could be clarified slightly to bring out your intent. My suggestion would be something like this: https://i.imgur.com/x2YgZzx.png (starting from 41.521)
- 45.586: Missing piano note.
- 60.057: This repetition is really really good.
- 69.700: Ghost note.
- Some patterns feel a bit trillier than they should be, especially near the ending--quite a bit of the 16ths there feel more anchored than they deserve. However the flow of this file is excellent, and overall it does a great job at matching the energy of the song. Strong accept. [9/10]
Posted at 11:11pm on May 13th, 2023
Parallel Skydive (Zeta64) [7.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
- 0:01.869 While i like the idea of the color theory here, im not sure on the execution in this chart. As the notes are all piano, its quite vague as to which should and shouldn't be colored. For example 0:4.449 sounds like it shouldn't be colored, but is, and the group of notes at 0:05.307 are more similar to the notes at 0:03.592 but both receive different coloring. I'm not sure the differences between the notes are distinct enough, nor the execution good enough for this to remain in the chart. Seeing as this is the only spot with color theory I would recommend removing it from the chart.
- 0:47.307 There are a lot of these softer piano notes, usually a 16th before a phase that all get left uncharted, but probably should be.
- 0:51.164 missing piano note
- 1:34.342-1:41.199 I feel it might be better to tone down the layering and difficulty in this section a bit. Its a softer section of the song with not a lot going on, but the layering is quite dense. Comparing it to the next section where we see the song get louder and more energetic, but the only meaningful change in the chart structure is a few minijacks. By decreasing the difficulty/density, the change in intensity will better match whats going on in the music
While not a difficulty concern, I do feel there are a number of lengthy probably unintentional anchors throughout the chart, such as 0:57.557 (3) and 1:22.985 (1). While it doesn't have a major negative impact on the chart, you should be mindful of what patterns you are putting in your chart, intentional or otherwise. 0:09.057 has a random 13 trill for example. In general i find that the patterning and PR of the chart as a whole could be improved.