Shamshir -rough Pt.2 (Velocity) [7.5*/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.

- 0:04.341, 0:6.280 0:06.688 Missing piano note.

- 0:13.678 uncharted piano 32nd

- 0:14.341, 0:15.158, 0:15.464 ect. there are a lot of missing piano 16ths in this chart. As best i can tell they are usually lower notes not in the main high melody. I dont think this always does the best job of highlighting those high pitched notes and instead feels like missing notes from the rapid 16th onslaught. 0:20.056 is a good example where some random 16ths are charted while others aren't despite it being a mostly continuous line of low notes.

- 0:22.811 This 2134 roll feels extremely out of place pattern wise and it feels like leftover placeholder patterns that you forgot to actually pattern.

** 0:42.913, 1:38.423 This rhythm is blatantly wrong. It should just be 24ths starting at 0:43.117. Alternatively this 32nd pattern seems a little more accurate to the music https://i.imgur.com/vJavw5m.png

- 1:16.586 This section feels like it suffers the most from empty space. And it also seems to be a bit inconsistent in exactly what sounds are being followed.

- idk if this is intentional climax theory or what not but 1:39.749 and 0:01.280 are layered differently.

Overall its a fine file and does a good enough job of charting all the chaos, but there are a few sections that i really could be improved in that department. There are A LOT of random missing 16ths throughout the chart. They dont majorly impact the chart as a whole but you should go through and try to catch them all. Do be sure to fix the incorrect rhythms..

Shamshir -rough Pt.2 (Velocity) [7.5/10]
>Permission good (2019 BOF)
>Folder contents good

>**Fix title, missing hyphen at the end.

>Sync good

Playtest Impression, 1.0x Rate - Seems pretty good, might be some details to brush up.
Hello again.

10.260 - .362 - (super subjective) there is a pitch change in these two notes, I’d probably change to [23][124] or similar
34.647 - might want a note here
37.402 - ^
40.362 - .566 - recommend 34[23] to end the 4 anchor that starts just before this
44.749, (debatable)46.790 - jump?
1:13.729 - jump 16th earlier
1:36.586 -.994 - suggest 2[14] 2[14], definitely add jump on .994

Much improved from the last version. This slightly more focused version is nicely done. I like this one, but some polish would help it a bit too.

Also title fix pls.