35
28
21
14
7
Four Chords :: FFR Batch Submission
storn42 -
Four Chords -
PUP [8.25 / 10]
Aug/Sept 2022
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
From the album THE UNRAVELING OF PUPTHEBAND released under Rise Records
a nice chordy easier file.
Simfile Folder Name
Four Chords (Storn42)Note Count
294Chart Length
2:00Average NPS
2.5662Estimated Difficulty
22.93
First Note
0:06Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 6
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 0Jumps
x 23
Hands
x 41
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second4 - 12.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
4 - 8.00 nps 1 Second
7 - 7.00 nps 2 Seconds
11 - 5.50 nps 5 Seconds
20 - 4.00 nps 10 Seconds
36 - 3.60 nps 30 Seconds
100 - 3.33 nps 1 Minute
171 - 2.85 nps
Color Count
x 171 (58.16%)
x 9 (3.06%)
x 103 (35.03%)
x 1 (0.34%)
x 1 (0.34%)
x 1 (0.34%)
x 2 (0.68%)
x 0 (0%)
x 6 (2.04%)
Posted at 8:56am on September 19th, 2022
A new chart file was uploaded.
Posted at 9:14pm on September 27th, 2022
A new chart file was uploaded.
Posted at 3:11pm on November 18th, 2023
Four Chords (Storn42) [8/10] -FR-
PERMS OK
SYNC NOT OK
[FR] Sync is off by up to 16ms (variable) in the second half. See 1:18.545 for example.
1:11.308: Meh, this is too slow for the sweep it goes to. Starts at the first note correctly, but should probably end at the 3rd note, and maybe not be a quad flam. A 123 could be a nice hint at the ending's 234.
1:52.597-1:53.281: In this little section, the quantization feels wrong. Sounds much closer to 1:52.779, 1:52.936, 1:53.105 (correct), 1:53.232 (correct).
Pretty solid chart. Nothing too major to fix. Sync needs to be checked though.
Posted at 3:12pm on November 18th, 2023
Four Chords (storn42) [8.5/10]
- Perms, metadata are good
- Sync looking a bit off in some places, recommend double checking
0:51.114, 0:51.594 - PR does not match with the next two 24ths. They should be ascending.
0:54.095, 0:54.546 - ^ except these should go to 1 and 2
0:58.966 - This piano note is different than 0:57.006
1:01.936 - This sounds the same as 1:00.440
1:11.308 - Ouch
1:05.418 - Sounds a bit subtle for a hand
*1:29.461, 1:29.716 - Shift these two note into [4][2] or something else. You pattern unique gallops for each of these segments and this one in particular you already did at 1:15.478
1:57.895 - Also ouch
Damn this drop really hits your ears. Good chart, although I recommend double checking some of the PR notes if they were intentional or not. As well as recommend tweaking (*)
Posted at 11:48pm on November 18th, 2023
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 295 => 294
AVG NPS changed: 2.57492 => 2.56619
Hand Bias changed: 5 => 6
Posted at 11:48pm on November 18th, 2023
I've adjusted the sync a little bit, but im going to need more feedback than just "sync bad" if you want me to fix it. I just dont see how/where its majorly off sync.
@op
[FR] Sync is off by up to 16ms (variable) in the second half. See 1:18.545 for example.
- 1:18.545 isn't a note? i'm going to need some more feedback on this before i can fix it.
1:11.308: Meh, this is too slow for the sweep it goes to. Starts at the first note correctly, but should probably end at the 3rd note, and maybe not be a quad flam. A 123 could be a nice hint at the ending's 234.
- I disagree. I find that this covers the the sound perfectly.
1:52.597-1:53.281: In this little section, the quantization feels wrong. Sounds much closer to 1:52.779, 1:52.936, 1:53.105 (correct), 1:53.232 (correct).
- i've added a missing note and made the section more accurate.
@Deam
0:51.114, 0:51.594 - PR does not match with the next two 24ths. They should be ascending.
- This is intentional to show the chord shift from the precious two apreggios
0:54.095, 0:54.546 - ^ except these should go to 1 and 2
- i dont really see how moving the notes really changes the section here.
0:58.966 - This piano note is different than 0:57.006
1:01.936 - This sounds the same as 1:00.440
- the focus here is more the descending chords, then accurately PRing the arpeggios
1:11.308 - Ouch
- its a bit rude, but it fits.
1:05.418 - Sounds a bit subtle for a hand
- i agree
*1:29.461, 1:29.716 - Shift these two note into [4][2] or something else. You pattern unique gallops for each of these segments and this one in particular you already did at 1:15.478
- sure
1:57.895 - Also ouch
- I've recharted the section to be more accurately and hopefully less ouch (but probably still difficulty)
Posted at 10:46am on November 25th, 2023
Notes that I found off:
0:08.390
0:26.510 (very minor)
0:30.414
0:48.181
0:56.038
0:56.511 (minor)
1:05.418
1:20.544?
I'll wait for Oppie to determine his FR status
Posted at 9:07am on November 26th, 2023
thanks, i've updated the timing based on your feedback. Still unsure of what OP is unhappy with.
A new chart file was uploaded.
Posted at 9:25am on November 26th, 2023
Just been busy. Dont hesitate to DM me on discord whenever you need an FR resolved or changes checked. :)
Posted at 5:12pm on December 1st, 2023
Moving this to the DC Engine. If there are further fixes, please DM me or let me know.