35
28
21
14
7
La joyeuse danse industrielle :: FFR Batch Submission
ryandoesthings -
La joyeuse danse industrielle -
Le Perche Oreille [5 / 10]
Aug/Sept 2022
PublicEvents
Rejected
Open source audio https://archive.org/details/fpr051LePercheOreille-Dcoupages
Technical file
Simfile Folder Name
La joyeuse danse industrielle (ryandoesthings)Note Count
1922Chart Length
2:30Average NPS
13.2005Estimated Difficulty
87.28
First Note
0:04Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 68
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 52 4 - 488Jumps
x 296
Hands
x 175
Quads
x 34
Color Jumps
x 1
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps 1 Second
28 - 28.00 nps 2 Seconds
42 - 21.00 nps 5 Seconds
92 - 18.40 nps 10 Seconds
171 - 17.10 nps 30 Seconds
474 - 15.80 nps 1 Minute
903 - 15.05 nps
Color Count
x 630 (32.78%)
x 451 (23.47%)
x 17 (0.88%)
x 564 (29.34%)
x 0 (0%)
x 212 (11.03%)
x 0 (0%)
x 48 (2.5%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 12:30am on September 28th, 2022
"Le Perche Orielle" changed to "Le Perche Oreille", the correct spelling.
Posted at 12:24pm on May 12th, 2023
La Perche Oreille (ryandoesthings) [5/10]
PERMS OK
SYNC OK
13.642: The vocals here are quite far from straight 16ths.
16.968: This jump goes to nothing.
19.250: Missing note.
21.533: Missing note.
22.316: This goes at 22.446.
22.642: These arent 16ths but 12ths.
29.816: Hand.
38.098: Missing note.
42.533 & 42.794: Ghost notes.
47.424: These three jumps should start on 47.294.
1:02.555: Single.
1:19.250: Single.
1:21.859: This feels like it should be the jump, not the notes around it.
1:26.555: Why a jump?
1:38.229: These aren't 32nds.
This chart is not suitable for FFR. It is very loose on the abstract charting, with layering and patterning that isn't really consistent. The flow is pretty good and it would make for a fun casual chart on Etterna for example. As is though, it is too far from FFR's standards and would require a major rework to make things consistent and accurate.
Posted at 12:29pm on May 12th, 2023
La Perche Oreille
-----------------------------
- Permission, sync good.
* Author field in metadata should be your FFR username.
- This chart takes a very maximalist approach to the song that I don't feel works very well. There are a lot of anchors/jacks that don't go to a whole lot, and many of the 32nds are the same way. Some of these can be justified as abstract charting, but others are a stretch even for that. I won't go into specifics on these because they are quite pervasive throughout the whole file, but please let me know if you would like a bit more detail.
- 13.642: Layering is unclear here. 13.773 gets a hand when it is really just a hi-hat there and should hence be a single--that hand could perhaps go at 13.642 for kick + vocal, or just be omitted. It seems like you are using jumps for vocals alone, in which case 14.294 should get a jump too.
- 16.903: Why a jump for this & the next 32nd? Why no jump for 17.294? What are the two 16th jumps afterwards following?
- 18.338, 18.599: These should be singles, and 18.468 a jump. Perhaps 18.207 too if you want to use jumps for vocals.
- 20.555-21.207: This is an example of 32nds that I don't feel are justifiable even as abstract charting. Compare to 20.164, which are fine since those are real 32nds, and 17.816, which goes to a single held note and makes sense as an abstract representation of it.
- 21.207-21.990: These are basically the hardest one-handed anchor patterns possible. Is this what you want for this sound?
- 22.251: Misrhythm, 22.316 is a ghost note and the 32nd is actually at 22.447.
- 24.990: Is a trill what you want to do with the 32nds here? Consider reducing jump layering to allow more nuance here.
- 29.555: No 32nds for held note anymore?
- 30.338, 30.860: Prominent percussion after the buzzes here, could use jumps.
- 30.990-31.251: These jumps are a lot of emphasis to not a lot of sound.
- Since this file still has a ways to go before acceptance, I'm going to stop my review here since my comments about the rest of the file would be fairly similar to what I have mentioned so far. In general I feel that overlayering causes a lot of problems for the file--in addition to muddying it up, making it hard to decide what gets a jump and what doesn't, it severely limits your patterning options at times and forces anchors and such that don't actually make any sense. The trill at 24.990 is an example of this, but there are numerous smaller ones throughout. There are also some misrhythms, especially surrounding 32nd triplets that are in the wrong place--keep an eye out for those. Once both of those are done, I would recommend giving the file one more pass through looking specifically at consistency--are you using the same type of pattern for the same type of sound? Are you using your abstract 32nds any time that held note plays (or did you remove them completely)?
- There is definitely structure and thought behind this file, but it does need significant refinement before it is acceptable for FFR. Please DM me if you have any questions about the review though! [5/10]