Monticello Drive (Bamks) [7/10] -FR-

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

5.902: This is way too soft, should remove.

10.849: Ghost note. Just two notes in this flam.

22.073: Wrong timings for this flam. Much closer to 22.108, 22.167 & 22.215.

28.501: The three consecutive white notes on column 3 are a bit confusing to play as they don't match anything PR wise.

39.923-41.499: There's a long one hand trill that forms on the left hand here but isn't really musically justified. Consider changing the patterning a bit.

52.173: This mini trill is unnecessarily spiky. A normal flam like all other occurrences would be fine.

57.499: Bad PR here, causing another spike. Consider something like 213(24).

1:07.101 & 1:09.115: No jumps here, see 1:03.096 or 1:05.115 for example.

1:17.835: Making this a 4 2 flam would improve PR, given 1:17.091.

1:21.065: Move to column 3.

1:23.835: Move to col 2.

1:25.320-1:28.069: PR here is all wrong. It's not Always necessary to have proper PR, but in a piano song like this where it's really obvious, it feels odd when it's not consistent.

1:28.808 & 1:28.934: Inconsistency here with 1:28.069.

1:31.808: Bit overkill, a 3-notes flam would make more sense.

Overall a fun chart to play, but quite inconsistent with how the PR is managed, making the piano feel pretty arbitrary in a couple of spots. The first half is pretty decent but a lot of the inconsistency is in the second half where things are more crowded and attention to patterning is more important. Giving FR rating based on the second half needing a good cleanup since it should be relatively easy to fix.

Monticello Drive (Bamks) [8.5/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good, nice work!

Playtest Impression, 1.0x Rate - Pretty neat little file. Will have nitpicks.

52.063 - I don’t think this cameljack is justified in comparison to other bursts in the chart

This chart is very nicely done. I could point out some minor PR tweaks that might be nice, but this is good as is (except the above note, very highly recommend changing it). Good stuff!

Fixed all the suggestions by OP, also fixed some other layering and minor PR tweaks.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 499 => 486
AVG NPS changed: 4.3836 => 4.2694
Hand Bias changed: -27 => -16

LGTM