Janus :: FFR Batch Submission
gold stinger - Janus - COMPOSER 3 [7 / 10]
15th Official Tournament (More Than 70 Difficulty)
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
https://manbow.nothing.sh/event/event.cgi?action=More_def&num=93&event=133
BMSofFighters open source permissions.

COMPOSER 3 is a collab alias of Lokan & Landscaper (would have to link outwards to these individuals as 'members of band' on the wiki).

Jazzy fun (maybe tournament-worthy) file.

Re-sub directly from Ooga-Booga, since it was suggested that it could use actual notes. Thought it most appropriate to go here since it was initially thought to be tournament-worthy.

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

- This file is a collaboration between multiple authors / stepauthors.

Simfile Folder Name

Janus (gold stinger)

Note Count

1586

Chart Length

2:13

Average NPS

12.2063

Estimated Difficulty

83.11

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 4

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 4 3 - 69 4 - 28

Jumps

x 324

Hands

x 73

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 4

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps 1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps 2 Seconds
37 - 18.50 nps 5 Seconds
88 - 17.60 nps 10 Seconds
163 - 16.30 nps 30 Seconds
411 - 13.70 nps 1 Minute
781 - 13.02 nps

Color Count

x 423 (26.67%)
x 388 (24.46%)
x 60 (3.78%)
x 584 (36.82%)
x 47 (2.96%)
x 27 (1.7%)
x 44 (2.77%)
x 4 (0.25%)
x 9 (0.57%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.2s0.77s0.6s0.57s0.4s0.4s0.4s0.4s
35
28
21
14
7

Janus
-----
- Permissions, sync, metadata good.

- 4.794: I feel the piano is given fairly weak treatment in this section--perhaps forcing a little OHT by moving this onto column 3 would make it feel stronger, and would also line up with 3.246. Could do something similar at 7.407 etc.
- 12.827: Suggest [34] jump so the left hand OHT emphasizes piano and stops when piano stops.
- 14.923: Is this to percussion or brass? If percussion, it's late; if brass, it's early and should just be straight 16ths.
- 21.875: Ghost note?
- 26.375: Seeing as there's no brass here, the pattern feels like it should be more distinct--as is, it's just the same stuff as before. Perhaps something like this: https://i.imgur.com/a9mKQWG.png
- 28.407: Should be on the 12th.
- 32.956: Suggest [12], OHT is unfitting here.
- 34.117: Not sure how I feel about a hand here--cymbal is quite soft and there's no brass to back it up.
- 34.698: No clue what this minijack is for.
- 38.230: I have a hard time picking this sound out on 1.0.
- 42.149: You don't follow any other wobble around here, please remove.
- 42.633: I do understand this minijack, though personally it seems a bit soft to follow.
- 48.149: I just hear 16ths here.
- 49.117: Suggest [12][34] [14] here both for PR and to take a little strain off the right hand.
- 52.310: Misrhythm: this is a 5/96th triplet starting at 52.343. In particular you have an extra note right now.
- 54.923, 55.214, etc.: These jumps feel a bit heavy to me; these little kicks are dwarfed by the brass afterwards and jumps feel too much for them. Also 61.117/etc. Compare with 103.455-104.617, where the percussion before the hand is arguably more prominent and is followed with singles.
- 57.085: Omit 48th here or do something similar at 57.343.
- 58.214: More kick layering issues: much softer than previous three jumps & followed as single at 57.826, so should be single.
- 61.988: No flam here, though there is one at 62.568.
* 63.439: Why colouring here?
- 71.133: Missing note.
- 78.681: Suggest [12] because this is kind of a silly right hand pattern and there's no piano here to justify it.
- 83.326: This doesn't sound like part of the jack--I think a 2-note minijack after this would work better, e.g. [34]22[13][24].
- 91.359: Your previously consistent jack usage breaks down from here til the break.
- 97.262: OHT doesn't make much sense here--could probably just omit 97.552 and be fine.
- 111.391-117.778: Good stuff.
- 119.326: As this doesn't technically have the snare on it from the previous two jumps, I'd suggest not having it on both the same columns; something like [23][23][124]3.
* 120.681: ow

- You occasionally follow some quiet, minor percussion (e.g. the hi-hats at 16.407 etc; again 53.859) which I personally feel would be best omitted to let the more melodic elements of the song shine through, but it is consistently done.
- Hmmm... conflicted on this. Second half is overall pretty nice, but first half could use quite a bit of polish. It plays well enough for an accept, but you really should give it a good comb-over. [7/10]

* 63.439 - Because it's an incorrectly paced time-signature that doesn't work with any colorization (half a measure of 10/16). It would otherwise be 20ths. Similar situation happens at 0:44.955.

* 120.681 - I moved both iterations of this to [24][23][123] (this one and the previous one) so that they play the same (as they should song-wise).

Outside of those, I've implemented every note that you've written down. Thanks for the extremely detailed notes! Try not to push yourself too hard on them, yeah? x)

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1584 => 1586
AVG NPS changed: 12.19087 => 12.20626
Hand Bias changed: -8 => 4