35
28
21
14
7
Insight :: FFR Batch Submission
Rapta -
Insight -
Haywyre [6.75 / 10]
Event Tokens
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
Monstercat Blanket Permission
Simfile Folder Name
Insight (Rapta)Note Count
1182Chart Length
2:35Average NPS
7.7559Estimated Difficulty
64.2
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 22
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 4 3 - 4 4 - 13Jumps
x 135
Hands
x 2
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 4
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
9 - 18.00 nps 1 Second
15 - 15.00 nps 2 Seconds
25 - 12.50 nps 5 Seconds
59 - 11.80 nps 10 Seconds
114 - 11.40 nps 30 Seconds
311 - 10.37 nps 1 Minute
566 - 9.43 nps
Color Count
x 401 (33.93%)
x 347 (29.36%)
x 15 (1.27%)
x 323 (27.33%)
x 45 (3.81%)
x 32 (2.71%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 19 (1.61%)
Posted at 8:02pm on August 6th, 2022
Insight (Rapta) [5.5/10]
>Permission check good.
>Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
>No issues found within simfile properties.
>No issues found within submission folder contents.
-[00:01.709] PR should probably descend here, rather than ascend.
-[00:14.673] This is such a miss imo to not step the claps as jumps here. ([14][23] in this case, [13][24] in the next case, etc.)
-[00:14.173] Double-check how this particular 24th-into-4th pattern is being layered as they are going into the jumps. In this case, the 4th becomes anchored with the 8th jump. However, with the immediate next one at 00:15.959, the notes involved in this pattern are exact opposites of the jump, and very much not anchored. It becomes anchored again at 00:19.387. Also, you have an instance of overlap but no anchor at 00:24.530. This is directly attributed to weak structure within the chart.
-[00:47.673] This isn’t 32nds here. This is 24th polyrhythm mixed with 16ths, and ends on the 8th, yet 32nds continue upwards to the 16th after the 8th.
-[00:50.887] This is closer to what was described above, but still incorrect.
-[02:02.744] Missing 24th from the piano here.
-[02:04.173 -> 02:04.387] 24ths here, instead of 16th.
-Chart could use a lot of small fixes & structure work. If you take into consideration jumps for claps mentioned from timestamp 00:14.673, keep in mind that would also affect structure later in the file such-as 02:14.673 and similar-sounding patterns.
Posted at 8:03pm on August 6th, 2022
Insight (Rapta) [8/10]
>Permission good (Monstercat)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good
Playtest Impression, 1.0x Rate - Will have a few nitpicks, but seems good otherwise.
17.173, etc. - These minijacks are pretty spicy especially now that we’re in the non-framer era (won’t get nerfed to 3-framers). I think they’re okay even if you might get yelled at a bit by the playerbase. I like the one hand climaxes in this section (eg. 33.959) too.
1:47.253, 1:48.218 - very nitpicky, but these should be on different arrows for PR imo
2:04.066 - ghost
This one’s pretty straightforward. There’s not a lot I can say without just flat out directing you to make it exactly how I would have. This is a perfectly fine file, no real complaints here.
Posted at 9:49pm on August 6th, 2022
Third judgment posted due to a 2+ point rating difference with one reject and one accept.
Ultimately I think the notes GS points out are sufficient to put this in reject territory unfortunately. I think the note about the claps at 14.673 is pretty subjective and it's fine as it is (though it'd also be fine to follow it ofc). However, the 24th misrhythms mentioned in the last 4 notes are pretty significant and should be fixed, and while a bit more minor, I agree with Tru's notes at 1:47.253 and 2:04.066 too.
Personally I'm really not a fan of the minijacks, I think players will find them very spiky in a chart which is otherwise as easy as this is. 210bpm minijacks in a chart which otherwise peaks at light 140bpm jumpstream and a couple of short, isolated 32nd bursts are pretty ouch. At the least, the minijacks finishing in one-handed jumps (17.245, 30.888) need to be rearranged to not do that--I'd say they're acceptable provided that change is made, but I still wouldn't like them personally.