Master Maid v2 :: FFR Batch Submission
DarkZtar -
Master Maid v2 -
DJ Sharpnel [6.75 / 10]
October/November 2021
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
Master Maid v2 (DarkZtar)
Note Count
3308
Chart Length
4:31
Average NPS
12.3911
Estimated Difficulty
92.84
First Note
0:05
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 121
3 - 65
4 - 464
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps
1 Second
23 - 23.00 nps
2 Seconds
36 - 18.00 nps
5 Seconds
82 - 16.40 nps
10 Seconds
157 - 15.70 nps
30 Seconds
451 - 15.03 nps
1 Minute
850 - 14.17 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
8.6s0.77s0.47s0.3s0.3s0.17s0.17s0.17s
Posted at 1:35am on June 3rd, 2022
Master Maid v2 (DarkZtar) [8/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Sync good
>Folder contents, metadata good
(Playtest Impression, 0.9x Rate) There may have never been a file more normal than this.
Perfectly normal. Don’t see any issues. Should receive a normal community response.
Posted at 1:46am on June 3rd, 2022
Master Maid v2
--------------
- Permissions, sync, metadata good.
- 6.237: I get this, but would prefer if the minijack started here to match the next one. Similarly 11.160 etc. (Notably in spots like 16.160 it forces a rather harder 3[34] pattern.)
- 8.390: Shouldn't be on the same column as 8.160. Similarly 9.621 etc.
- 120.237-138.698: Can't see any rhyme or reason as to what columns the 8th jacks switch to? It's alright but I'd prefer a bit more order here.
- 170.390: Percussion changes a bit here, a straight jumptrill feels too homogeneous.
- 190.160, 200.006, etc: Weaker percussion, suggest removing from minijack.
- 190.698/etc: Two 2-note minijacks would feel more consistent with the rest of the chart here.
- 208.775: Needlessly obtuse transition.
- The 3-column gimmick feels really weird and unnecessary--parts of it work well (like 170.698) but I feel in most places you're constraining yourself too much for too little reason. The trill at 65.467 is a striking example of this but I have many more issues with it than just that. There are parts of this that I quite like (the 20ths stand out as a really nice decision) and it's technically sound but I don't feel the chart's central gimmick works. [5.5/10]
NOTE: Scores on this file are divisive, and it is currently awaiting a third judge before receiving a verdict.
Posted at 2:49pm on June 19th, 2022
Third judge - ositz
Posted at 10:29am on June 20th, 2022
Could just state that this would be accepted as token if that was ostiz's response. Other than that this just shows how narrow minded the judges/judging structure has become. Technically sound, structure is defined, but don't like chart gimmick -> reject.