35
28
21
14
7
Erase Me :: FFR Batch Submission
storn42 -
Erase Me -
Make Them Suffer [7.75 / 10]
October/November 2021
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=140821
Song is from the album How To Survive A Funeral which was released under rise records whom we have perms for.
So i thought i'd try charting something hard.
So i thought i'd try charting something hard.
✔️ The stepauthor has acknowledged the judges notes.
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
Simfile Folder Name
Erase Me (Storn42)Note Count
2364Chart Length
3:45Average NPS
10.6263Estimated Difficulty
82.21
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -6
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 4 4 - 169Jumps
x 549
Hands
x 150
Quads
x 23
Color Jumps
x 2
Color Hands
x 2
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps 2 Seconds
40 - 20.00 nps 5 Seconds
95 - 19.00 nps 10 Seconds
174 - 17.40 nps 30 Seconds
468 - 15.60 nps 1 Minute
838 - 13.97 nps
Color Count
x 1013 (42.85%)
x 637 (26.95%)
x 184 (7.78%)
x 407 (17.22%)
x 93 (3.93%)
x 6 (0.25%)
x 2 (0.08%)
x 7 (0.3%)
x 15 (0.63%)
Posted at 1:35am on June 3rd, 2022
Erase Me (storn42) [7.5/10]
>Permission good (Rise Records)
>Sync good
>Folder contents, metadata good
(Playtest Impression, 1.0x Rate) This is a storn file. Personally I only found the js relatively difficult but feels pretty balanced overall.
38.218 - ghost?
1:01.436-1:21.862 / 2:02.713-2:23.138 - Layering feels pretty wonky here. I understand it’s pretty additive, but the quads at 1:04.628/1:05.904/1:16.117(and similar in the second section noted) especially feel out of place. Recommend you make them hands so the shouty parts here (that have more/stronger use of quads) will stand out more. Ultimately a pretty subjective note so your choice.
1:02.393 - ghost? Is inconsistent in comparison with other such spots in this section
1:39.495 - ghost? Similar situation as 38.218
1.52.500 - lol
1:54.894/1:55.053, 2:00.000/.159, etc. - missing PR? Change one of these jumps if you think it matters
2:58.564-3:29.202 - storn moment. I love it.
A few touch-ups would help, but otherwise solid.
Posted at 1:42am on June 3rd, 2022
Erase Me
--------
- Permissions, sync, metadata good.
- 64.626, 69.094, 69.732, etc.: I get that these quads are a result of additive layering, but I don't feel they really make sense as quads in the context of the chart. Would generally stick with hands. (Also in later sections e.g. 125.900.)
- 72.604: Piano here, similar to 62.392.
- 81.700: I don't think it'd be too much to include a jump here for piano.
- 112.496: This sure caught me by surprise on my sightread. Consider nerfing, though up to your judgment.
- 164.037: Minijack would be effective here.
- Good stuff, the dense jumpstream in the first half was well done and I really liked the jack section in the ending. Layering did feel slightly funky at times though--see 64.626 note for one, and in the 146.963-173.772 interlude I sometimes had trouble discerning what exactly you were following. [8/10]
Posted at 2:31pm on June 3rd, 2022
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2357 => 2364
AVG NPS changed: 10.59485 => 10.62631
Hand Bias changed: 3 => -6
Posted at 2:31pm on June 3rd, 2022
trumaestro
38.218 - ghost?
- i can hear a clear drum note here.
1:01.436-1:21.862 / 2:02.713-2:23.138 - Layering feels pretty wonky here. I understand it’s pretty additive, but the quads at 1:04.628/1:05.904/1:16.117(and similar in the second section noted) especially feel out of place. Recommend you make them hands so the shouty parts here (that have more/stronger use of quads) will stand out more. Ultimately a pretty subjective note so your choice.
- This is definitely the weakest section of the chart that i was unsure of so i appreciate the feedback. based on the double feedback i'll tone back the quads for the sung vocals. I will however also up the layering on the screamed vocals in the chorus to hands/quads. should be more appropriate and give some nice contrast between the two.
1:02.393 - ghost? Is inconsistent in comparison with other such spots in this section
- more drums, i know these notes can be harder to hear but its 100% there.
1:39.495 - ghost? Similar situation as 38.218
- again, another drum note
1.52.500 - lol
- i'm glad this was well received.
1:54.894/1:55.053, 2:00.000/.159, etc. - missing PR? Change one of these jumps if you think it matters
- If there was PR here, i would argue that jacks are exactly whats required. You have a double cymbal hit with a double guitar note (which i dont believe changes pitch) Eitherway the jacked jumps are very much intentional
2:58.564-3:29.202 - storn moment. I love it.
- :)
Pizza69
64.626, 69.094, 69.732, etc.: I get that these quads are a result of additive layering, but I don't feel they really make sense as quads in the context of the chart. Would generally stick with hands. (Also in later sections e.g. 125.900.)
- see trumaestro note.
72.604: Piano here, similar to 62.392.
81.700: I don't think it'd be too much to include a jump here for piano.
- these piano notes can be so hard to hear.
112.496: This sure caught me by surprise on my sightread. Consider nerfing, though up to your judgment.
- I think the most surprising thing is that there is a random dump in the middle of the chart. In my experience though, knowing its there i've had barely any trouble hitting it.
164.037: Minijack would be effective here.
- thats actually a really good idea for the section.