35
28
21
14
7
One More Yell :: FFR Batch Submission
WirryWoo -
One More Yell -
Riora [6.75 / 10]
July/August 2021
PublicEvents
Rejected
http://manbow.nothing.sh/event/event.cgi?action=More_def&num=376&event=133
BMS Open Source Perms.
Simfile Folder Name
One More Yell (WirryWoo)Note Count
962Chart Length
1:44Average NPS
9.5531Estimated Difficulty
65.76
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -38
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 173Jumps
x 213
Hands
x 88
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
18 - 18.00 nps 2 Seconds
32 - 16.00 nps 5 Seconds
74 - 14.80 nps 10 Seconds
143 - 14.30 nps 30 Seconds
370 - 12.33 nps 1 Minute
646 - 10.77 nps
Color Count
x 548 (56.96%)
x 408 (42.41%)
x 2 (0.21%)
x 2 (0.21%)
x 2 (0.21%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 3:11pm on December 11th, 2021
One More Yell (WirryWoo) [7/10]
>Permission good (2020 BOF)
>Sync good
>Metadata, Folder contents good
14.654 - note? debatable
16.849 - suggest to detach these first two from the 1 anchor for clarity but not necessary
First half of this isn't overly interesting, but it picks up a bit around half way through. I'm not personally a fan of this one, but I can see some appeal. I think you've done what you can with this. It's a simple file that captures the song pretty well. Good to go.
*Ratings are not final until both judges have posted their notes and the file status is updated.*
Posted at 1:38pm on December 15th, 2021
One More Yell (WirryWoo) [6.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
- 0:23.736 Given the strength of these notes, I would recommend moving these notes to not jack with 0:24.580. The way it is right now almost looks like a vocal jack, which is not the case. There are many instances of this pattern in the chart, so do be sure to check them all.
- 0:32.946 This jack gets a special mention for being a 5 note jack. I understand that you're being quite strict with the pattern choices, but do be consistent with these things. as this is the single instance where this happens.
- 0:37.629 make that two instances.
- 0:52.117 Such a sound like these not being charted feels wrong. Its a failure of the strict structure of the song. many notes like this in the section that should be charted are just left out because they dont fit the structure, and i simply do not agree with it.
- 0:53.141 this is really where the strict layering falls apart for me. You're just trying to chart too many things in one section so specifically that this anchor appears. It such a soft sound comparatively and, imo does not deserve a jack like this, and would be better off being moved to 3.
Quite frankly the structure of this chart is just too strict for me. I think a great deal can be gained by simply loosening up the structure and not being so strict with it. I feel the strictness of X sound creating X note on X column really detracts from what could be an otherwise pretty fun song. switch it up more and i feel the file would be greatly improved.