Video Challenge (trumaestro) [5.0/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
> Nice .sm file name, as always.

-[00:06.463] This entire intro section that are using [12] and [34] jumps are quite repetitive, especially considering it repeats the entire section at 00:16.703. It doesn't need to be strictly tied to one-hand, as the following verse shows.

-[00:33.983] Missing jump? You are stepping both drums & main melody as jumps here, and this is part of main melody.

-[00:40.543 & 00:40.863] Jumps on these 8ths. Repeat issue at 00:43.103

-[00:41.503 / 00:44.063] 16ths start here, See: 00:42.783, 00:40.223. I get the layering approach you are doing here, but some of these missing 16ths within this context harp on 16ths that are stepped, and become notably missing in the rhythm.

-[01:12.303] Rather quiet for a 16th.

-[01:22.303] Everything from this jump and everything at 01:12.063 are musically the same but vastly different in the way they are stepped.

-[01:36.063] Missing jump? Measure transitions (like 01:33.503, 01:30.943, 01:28.383) all contain jumps, but sometimes throughout the file, these sort of measure transitional jumps are omitted for singles. This is the same as 00:34.623.

-[00:26.943 & 01:28.383] These two timestamps share the same audio but step approaches are vastly different, despite it should be sharing some resemblance between jumps/singles used.

-[01:42.302 / 01:46.142 / 01:48.702 etc.] These 8ths hit hard, kinda wish they were jumps.

-[02:24.142 / 02:24.302] Missing 16ths?

-[02:33.182 / 02:33.502] Not using the 8ths here.

-Chart has a fair amount of inconsistency issues across singles & jumps, and needs a fine combing over. I wouldn't be comfortable seeing it go in as-is, and too much to cover for CQ unfortunately. Most of the 16th layering is fine, it's just the jump layering.

Video Challenge (trumaestro) [5.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
> Nice .sm file name, as always.

- 6.783 - considering the anchors later in the file, forcing a 1 [34] or 4 [12] pattern seems a bit excessive. It Feels a bit boring and needlessly limiting. I wouldn't mind seeing some [13][24] or [14] in there.
- 7.423 - this note seems to be randomly on 2, where all other instances would find it on 1
- 28.223 - The stream here seems a bit confusing to me. A lot of percussion notes are missing like 28.463 and 29.263. But 28.783 is the only 16th i hear that exists in the melody. Its hard to say if its purposely omitted, but there are a lot more missing percussion notes in the chart that feel like they should be included, such as:
29.983, 30.383, 37.903, 39.183, 52.143, 57.903, 1:12.543, 1:14.383, 1:22.783, 1:24.783, 1:29.903, 1:30.543, 1:30.863, 1:33.423, 1:35.343
- 28.863, 33.983 1:30.303, 1:35.423 - missing jump. The melody has another note here that isn’t charted. Its the same pitch as 28.703, but still a new distinct note.
- 1:12.303 - seems to be a ghost note.
- 1:15.343 - another ghost note
- 1:17.663 - I cant hear these 32nds
- 1:30.223 - this note for the melody is missing despite being in the chart earlier at 28.783
- 1:59.502, 1:59.662 - these 16ths are ghost notes.
- 2:43.502 While there is a note here, i wouldn’t step it. The music is actually a 3 note pattern, and this is just the bottom note that is usually skipped. I think leaving out the last two notes here would be fine.
- The chart in general feels a bit unpolished and inconsistent. Tons of missing and ghost notes, and some of the patterning just feels a bit questionable. I feel the file needs a bit more work to be polished up to an acceptable level.

ye I definitely shat this out without much thought lmao