35
28
21
14
7
Cold Storage :: FFR Batch Submission
Pizza69 -
Cold Storage -
Terminal 11 [7 / 10]
May/June 2021
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273002&postcount=3
Blanket permissions from Terminal 11.
Collab with VisD.
Collab with VisD.
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Cold Storage (Pizza69 & VisD)" vs "Cold Storage (Pizza69)"
- This file is a collaboration between multiple authors / stepauthors.
Simfile Folder Name
Cold Storage (Pizza69 & VisD)Note Count
2683Chart Length
3:53Average NPS
11.6483Estimated Difficulty
96.94
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -57
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 77 3 - 81 4 - 363Jumps
x 537
Hands
x 65
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 3
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps 1 Second
23 - 23.00 nps 2 Seconds
43 - 21.50 nps 5 Seconds
99 - 19.80 nps 10 Seconds
193 - 19.30 nps 30 Seconds
556 - 18.53 nps 1 Minute
1061 - 17.68 nps
Color Count
x 1002 (37.35%)
x 695 (25.9%)
x 113 (4.21%)
x 581 (21.65%)
x 113 (4.21%)
x 61 (2.27%)
x 30 (1.12%)
x 28 (1.04%)
x 60 (2.24%)
Posted at 10:38pm on June 30th, 2021
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2695 => 2683
AVG NPS changed: 11.70043 => 11.64834
Hand Bias changed: -61 => -57
Posted at 10:10pm on November 6th, 2021
Cold Storage (Pizza69 & VisD) [7.0/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> Chart is on ‘Challenge’ Difficulty.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
-Really feels like most of the long sections with primarily only 4ths could’ve been cut for time in an already long song here, as there isn’t much interesting stuff happening within them.
-[02:56.417] Pretty strenuous on left-hand here
-[03:04.214/03:13.809] Not seeing much of the significance for the 192nd jumps here. Elaborate? They could probably pass for some normal 4ths/8ths otherwise.
-[03;23.405] This is a lot more clearer to what the 192nds are going to, but I agree with the 3rd 192nd being a single in this instance more-so than the 3rd 192nd in previous instances being a jump.
-[03:33.300/03:42.896] Missing 192nd jump?
-[03:36.599/03:38.998] Reduced 4th jumps here in previous iterations with the new measure because of the main instrument supporting these 4th jumps disappearing (see: 03:31.501, 03:34.200)
-[03:46.194/03:48.593] Some level of copy-pasting happening here given the previous note.
-Chart concept is clean, not a super-fan of copy-pasting happening in the final leg of this file. Could use some touch-ups but I wouldn’t be angry about it getting put in.