Shind Bad :: FFR Batch Submission
Wiosna - Shind Bad - DJ SHARPNEL [8 / 10]
Feb/March 2021
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273001&postcount=2

Simfile Folder Name

Shind Bad (Wiosna)

Note Count

4235

Chart Length

4:24

Average NPS

16.2323

Estimated Difficulty

91.42

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 13

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 709

Jumps

x 1179

Hands

x 72

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps 2 Seconds
41 - 20.50 nps 5 Seconds
97 - 19.40 nps 10 Seconds
192 - 19.20 nps 30 Seconds
570 - 19.00 nps 1 Minute
1083 - 18.05 nps

Color Count

x 1504 (35.51%)
x 1273 (30.06%)
x 0 (0%)
x 1319 (31.15%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 2 (0.05%)
x 137 (3.23%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.5s0.47s0.43s0.43s0.33s0.33s0.33s0.3s
35
28
21
14
7

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Artist changed: DJ SHARPNEL => DJ Sharpnel
----------
Note Count changed: 4223 => 4231
AVG NPS changed: 16.18628 => 16.21694

Shind Bad
---------
- Permissions, sync good.
** Metadata contains background information, please remove.

- 10.415: I don't really agree with the change in 16th usage here. The song picks up briefly, as captured by this hand, but then as far as my ears can discern goes back to exactly the same beat as before, so the overall increase in intensity feels odd. Would make the intro uniformly like it is after 10.415 myself.
- a little disappointed not to see trillier patterns or the like to represent the percussion from 41.383-41.839, 43.812, etc. but that's a minor detail
- 87.077: Given that 87.380 is a jump, I'd argue this should be too.
- 89.506, 94.364: Missing vocal jump.
- 113.036/etc: So this is acceptable and I think splitrolls are a great choice of patterning, but I'm not sure how I feel about omitting the actual 16ths at the beginning of this phrase and then dumping 16ths immediately after. Would personally advocate filling in the 16ths at 113.112 & 113.263, omitting the one at 113.567 in favour of a jump on the beat, and starting the splitroll there since that's where the held note really begins.
- 117.438, 197.592, 257.100: No vocal here, suggest single.
- 121.689: There's more variation to the sound here than a straight jumpjack would imply.
- 165.713: Missing vocal jump here, while the next two don't correspond to vocals.
- 171.329: This anchor feels a touch too long.

- Jump usage is structurally very well done and feels excellent to play, barring some minor inconsistencies. Other than that, really just a few small structural qualms, and unfortunately the CQ for metadata. [8/10 CQ]

10.415 - i don't really have a reason for it other than giving the section an additional sense of progression because the intro was a bit underlayered as is. i don't think that using the same density would be right because it would either be too repetitive or too much from the start, so i went with progression there even if there isn't a notable cue for it.
41.383-41.839/etc. - was thinking of it but i need to see if there's an easy way of doing this, i don't think so though.
87.077 - i thought 87.380 was a piano note, whoops. removed 87.380
89.506/94.364 - fixed both
113.036 - i can hear the percussion at 113.112 but not 113.263. i personally don't agree much with starting the split roll at that part even though you're right that the held note starts on the 4th, but the instrumentation has a held note on the 8th. added notes for 113.112/etc.
117.438/etc - yerp
121.689/etc. - omg fine ositz
165.713 - fixed
171.329 - changed a bit

changed metadata etc., thanks for the notes!

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Title changed: Shind Bad => SHIND BAD
Artist changed: DJ Sharpnel => DJ SHARPNEL
----------
Note Count changed: 4231 => 4235
AVG NPS changed: 16.21694 => 16.23227
Hand Bias changed: 21 => 13

Please remove parenthesis from subtitle.