Shind Bad :: FFR Batch Submission
Wiosna -
Shind Bad -
DJ SHARPNEL [8 / 10]
Feb/March 2021
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
Simfile Folder Name
Shind Bad (Wiosna)
Note Count
4235
Chart Length
4:24
Average NPS
16.2323
Estimated Difficulty
91.42
First Note
0:03
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 709
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps
1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps
2 Seconds
41 - 20.50 nps
5 Seconds
97 - 19.40 nps
10 Seconds
192 - 19.20 nps
30 Seconds
570 - 19.00 nps
1 Minute
1083 - 18.05 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
0.5s0.47s0.43s0.43s0.33s0.33s0.33s0.3s
Posted at 6:46am on March 16th, 2021
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Artist changed: DJ SHARPNEL => DJ Sharpnel
----------
Note Count changed: 4223 => 4231
AVG NPS changed: 16.18628 => 16.21694
Posted at 7:58pm on October 3rd, 2021
Shind Bad
---------
- Permissions, sync good.
** Metadata contains background information, please remove.
- 10.415: I don't really agree with the change in 16th usage here. The song picks up briefly, as captured by this hand, but then as far as my ears can discern goes back to exactly the same beat as before, so the overall increase in intensity feels odd. Would make the intro uniformly like it is after 10.415 myself.
- a little disappointed not to see trillier patterns or the like to represent the percussion from 41.383-41.839, 43.812, etc. but that's a minor detail
- 87.077: Given that 87.380 is a jump, I'd argue this should be too.
- 89.506, 94.364: Missing vocal jump.
- 113.036/etc: So this is acceptable and I think splitrolls are a great choice of patterning, but I'm not sure how I feel about omitting the actual 16ths at the beginning of this phrase and then dumping 16ths immediately after. Would personally advocate filling in the 16ths at 113.112 & 113.263, omitting the one at 113.567 in favour of a jump on the beat, and starting the splitroll there since that's where the held note really begins.
- 117.438, 197.592, 257.100: No vocal here, suggest single.
- 121.689: There's more variation to the sound here than a straight jumpjack would imply.
- 165.713: Missing vocal jump here, while the next two don't correspond to vocals.
- 171.329: This anchor feels a touch too long.
- Jump usage is structurally very well done and feels excellent to play, barring some minor inconsistencies. Other than that, really just a few small structural qualms, and unfortunately the CQ for metadata. [8/10 CQ]
Posted at 9:29am on October 4th, 2021
10.415 - i don't really have a reason for it other than giving the section an additional sense of progression because the intro was a bit underlayered as is. i don't think that using the same density would be right because it would either be too repetitive or too much from the start, so i went with progression there even if there isn't a notable cue for it.
41.383-41.839/etc. - was thinking of it but i need to see if there's an easy way of doing this, i don't think so though.
87.077 - i thought 87.380 was a piano note, whoops. removed 87.380
89.506/94.364 - fixed both
113.036 - i can hear the percussion at 113.112 but not 113.263. i personally don't agree much with starting the split roll at that part even though you're right that the held note starts on the 4th, but the instrumentation has a held note on the 8th. added notes for 113.112/etc.
117.438/etc - yerp
121.689/etc. - omg fine ositz
165.713 - fixed
171.329 - changed a bit
changed metadata etc., thanks for the notes!
Posted at 9:31am on October 4th, 2021
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Title changed: Shind Bad => SHIND BAD
Artist changed: DJ Sharpnel => DJ SHARPNEL
----------
Note Count changed: 4231 => 4235
AVG NPS changed: 16.21694 => 16.23227
Hand Bias changed: 21 => 13
Posted at 5:16pm on November 10th, 2021
Please remove parenthesis from subtitle.
Posted at 11:47am on November 21st, 2021
no!
(resent)