Quantum Uncertainty [Another] :: FFR Batch Submission
trumaestro - Quantum Uncertainty [Another] - Norrin Radd [6.5 / 10]
Feb/March 2021
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Norrin_Radd/Anomaly/09_-_Quantum_Uncertainty
CC-BY-NC-SA https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Norrin_Radd/Anomaly/09_-_Quantum_Uncertainty

Maybe only one of these should go in? The only difference between them is -very- obvious.
Unsure about [Another] vs Heavy/Oni but here you go

Simfile Folder Name

Quantum Uncertainty [Another] (trumaestro)

Note Count

406

Chart Length

0:31

Average NPS

14.4484

Estimated Difficulty

77.71

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -4

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 33 4 - 13

Jumps

x 103

Hands

x 0

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
11 - 22.00 nps 1 Second
21 - 21.00 nps 2 Seconds
39 - 19.50 nps 5 Seconds
80 - 16.00 nps 10 Seconds
156 - 15.60 nps 30 Seconds
0 - 0.00 nps 1 Minute
0 - 0.00 nps

Color Count

x 98 (24.14%)
x 92 (22.66%)
x 8 (1.97%)
x 162 (39.9%)
x 8 (1.97%)
x 36 (8.87%)
x 2 (0.49%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.33s0.2s0.2s0.2s0.13s0.13s0.13s0.13s
35
28
21
14
7

Quantum Uncertainty [Another]
-----------------------------
- I feel like only one of the two versions of this chart should go in because they're very similar overall--the charts are identical except that 4 of the jumpglut patterns are replaced by streams (and transitions out of them are adjusted accordingly). The stream patterns are fine, but other than that my complaints are exactly the same as the other version. For convenience I've reposted those notes below, with the glut-related note removed:

--

* 2.106, 4.677: These are the same sounds as the gallops at 1.784 and 4.356 respectively, the patterning should be changed to match.
- 5.534: Lower than the previous minijack, suggest column 3.
- 6.391: Suggest 2[13]22 here to alleviate column 1 bias.
- 9.710: Shouldn't be a minijack.
** 12.496-13.350, 14.207-15.064, etc.: PR can be improved in this section. The sound repeats several times, but the patterning is different every time and the PR is never quite right. (Some repetition / use of a motif would work well here--I don't think you have to worry about your 28 second long file feeling samey.)
- 15.814: Suggest removing this from column 1 to emphasize that it doesn't have the percussion you just followed with minijacks.
- 22.130: This is a little column 3-biased.
* 26.308: 3-note jack is spiky and unwarranted. The second and third notes could be a minijack but the first one is pretty distinct.
* 27.377: Should be offset 24ths like at 25.023.

- I like your layering structure, but the chart needs some polishing. The patterning in the 16th jumpstream sections lacks cohesion and intent, and there is plenty of opportunity to tighten it up. This sometimes results in unintentional anchoring / column bias, and while it tends to be pretty minor, there are times where it's noticeable nonetheless. CQ on **'d note; the *'d notes are not mandatory, but are significant and are the most important of the remaining notes. [6.5/10]