Growmeter :: FFR Batch Submission
bmah - Growmeter - mommy [9 / 10]
Nov/Dec 2020
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
This bms song has unusual time signatures. For the most part, it's 7/8 time, then later switches to 4/4, before going back to 7/8 again. The chart however is straightforward.

Simfile Folder Name

Growmeter (bmah)

Note Count

1317

Chart Length

1:56

Average NPS

11.7729

Estimated Difficulty

75.31

First Note

0:04

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -61

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 7 4 - 176

Jumps

x 304

Hands

x 89

Quads

x 7

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
23 - 23.00 nps 2 Seconds
41 - 20.50 nps 5 Seconds
89 - 17.80 nps 10 Seconds
166 - 16.60 nps 30 Seconds
444 - 14.80 nps 1 Minute
794 - 13.23 nps

Color Count

x 693 (52.62%)
x 505 (38.34%)
x 30 (2.28%)
x 89 (6.76%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.73s0.3s0.3s0.3s0.3s0.3s0.3s0.3s
35
28
21
14
7

Growmeter
---------
- Perms, sync, metadata good.

- 19.021: Imo it would be a bit more natural to stop this 16th run the next beat at 19.321. Would also (marginally) lessen the difficulty gap between two halves. Occurs several times in the chart, e.g. 31.615.
- 47.808: Personally feel like your pattern here stresses the ascending background sound a little much; I'd probably use something like [23][14][14][34][12][12] instead
- 57.703, 61.302: Reversed PR, 21 would be more accurate here.
- 76.595: The guitar doesn't really deserve a 7-note anchor on column 2, suggest breaking it up here (i.e. making this [134]). Alternatively, 76.745 could be a single (on column 4) because there's not much of a guitar note there. Similar comments at 81.393.
- 84.991: Anchoring is a little needlessly heavy here too imo.
- 87.240, 92.038: Missing jumps?
- 111.529: Should be followed as per your structure, but omitting is reasonable.

- This truly is the bmah. Spiky, but really fun and well constructed. Not a lot to point out here, and most of my notes are subjective. Great chart. [9/10]

"- 19.021: Imo it would be a bit more natural to stop this 16th run the next beat at 19.321. Would also (marginally) lessen the difficulty gap between two halves. Occurs several times in the chart, e.g. 31.615."
Holy crap I never recognized the 16ths continued a bit. Good catch.

"- 57.703, 61.302: Reversed PR, 21 would be more accurate here."
Yeah you're right...I think what I had going here was an ascending pattern where each ascension moved the trending of the arrows towards the right, but the last note of every phrase no matter what was a down arrow. But in the last phrase, the down arrow would be preceded by the left. Changed.

"- 76.595: The guitar doesn't really deserve a 7-note anchor on column 2, suggest breaking it up here (i.e. making this [134]). Alternatively, 76.745 could be a single (on column 4) because there's not much of a guitar note there. Similar comments at 81.393."
I think this was the byproduct of a limitation on the variety of jumps possible and wanting to use the [24] jump. But this resulted in some longer down arrow anchors. I do agree it doesn't feel too great, so I changed it.

"- 84.991: Anchoring is a little needlessly heavy here too imo."
I think this is also the byproduct of literally forcing the same 16th pattern into the current 8th jumps that already exist. I changed the patterns around, and now there is anchoring on the left arrow instead, but I feel it's a bit better still.

"- 87.240, 92.038: Missing jumps?"
No idea how I missed this. Good catch.

"- 111.529: Should be followed as per your structure, but omitting is reasonable."
Actually I just literally wasn't aware of it. Thanks again.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1306 => 1317
AVG NPS changed: 11.67461 => 11.77294
Hand Bias changed: -64 => -61