standard opening, something about how she is acting coy, this behavoir must be wolfish, wait i'm actually just trying to get discussion started, whatever
Then take initiative and talk with other people. Waiting for people to come to you is a poor choice.
I intend to, I'm just horrible at starting conversation, so i like to try and force others to approach me first. When I get too bored I'll start approaching others. Shouldn't take too long.
Originally posted by choof
you double dad loving dipshit
Originally posted by t-rogdor
dammit now i have to smoke a picture of choof out of a bong
Originally posted by smartdude1212
I can't be the only guy who has wondered what it'd be like to menstruate all over the shower.
here's a quick breakdown of RPS since i'm the only one whose really played it before
1. anyone on a team doesn't want to talk and wants to wait for others to talk
2. greens want to talk
3. greens also want to get rid of vigilantes which hurts a team pretty badly
4. teams want to lynch their target team's vigilante last in order to win
5. teams want to lynch the team-targeting-them's vigilante asap
6. the night death shows us that one team is down a person, with a 50% chance that it is the guardian and a 25% chance each that it is either the vigilante or the seer (slightly more likely seer dead than vigilante if the choice was based on role usefulness)
7. lynching someone who is obviously green is the strongest move in a day phase unless the green team unites quickly as a negotiating block -- this causes the teams to hide from each other most easily
8. this game will last 3 or less phases as late-game is less about figuring stuff out (shit becomes pretty clear) and more about negotiating and backstabbing
Ladies and gentlemen, we have our first two votes!
I appreciate the decision to spring into action and try to generate some meaningful conversation, but I'm not sure where to begin. I don't think firing off a random vote myself would contribute anything to the discussion.
We have roughly 48 hours left in Day 1. I can't see why the 11 of us would even somewhat agree on a "candidate." What do you all think? What's a good way we could pick up the level of activity inside this thread?
Comment